because he must be of simple backround

nothing state related

he must be pure man

a state choses with bias more than the folk

and the king has to fear the people

because if he diverts the people will revolt

as he fears god he fears the people of his nation

and for me that is enough to remove corruption

Look at Victor Emanuel

look at the Marie Antoinette

look at the Habsburgs

they are of noble backrounds

i said multiple times

that i dont want

any of that

You will be creating a new nobility

yes

because it pays off

to not have jews

on your throne

that spend all their money

on useless shit and ignore the people

What makes you so sure that the throne cant be corrupted like the old kings were

because they should fear the ones that put them in power

as they fear god

they should fear the people

the nation

Again why not simply have the party pick a new leader

since the party members got there via meritocracy

@ΕΘΝΙΚH ΑΝΤΙΣΤΑΣΗ yes but I meant, Gods are known in ancient Greek lieterature for being material beings, they don't take an abstract form while in Christianity God for once went to Earth in a human form

because the party isnt the people

why not have the councils of cooperatives have to approve the new leader in order to avoid corruption

yes someone would need to approve the leader

the corporatives and syndicates are the voice of the people after all

not always

anyways

ofc there would be other higher ups that would need to approve the leader

yes like the top party leaders

yes

they have to approve also

but I simply prefer that to having the new leader being the son of the previous one