Elective monarchies can be acceptable but still retarded

Im fine with hereditary as long as its not incest or not an autistic heir

Why do you think they are bullshit

As I see it

Its one of the few ways you can preserve an ideology

Heredity is gay. Appoint based on skill

Without fucking up in like 30-60 years

Well yes appoint is better

The thing is

If there is a new noble class

They all need to be educated

In a fascist sense

fAsCh mOnArcHy

fascist monarchy is fake and blue pilled

In a fascist state the nobility should just be those who have served the nation the most, not those with particular genes

hereditary is bound to degenerate into autism

Social Fascist Republic

How is fascist monarchy fake

If the people chose out of their own

A new class of nobles

And reject the old ones

<:oh:555739741337812992>

because fascism is naturally anti bourguasie

a king is literally just 1900s bourguasie

glorified one at that

Fascist more like nationalist

Wrong word

I sometimes use them interchangeably

a nationalist monarchy would just degenerate. What if they have one or two good kings if the rest are cringe in the end

>cringe

I mean look

Better have two lifetimes of nationalism than 1

Look at Romania, king Carol II and Mihai were retards

True

But

Ferdinand

United everyone

And no king ever really managed that

Except for Mihai

who cares about one if the rest are cringe. Rather have more good than cringe.

And Carol I was great