They're very specific in a case by case basis

i saw some cartoony artist rendition of feet because he had a fetish

and i figured that its in the shape

because theres curvature in them similar to tits or ass

Well good feet are aesthetically pleasing, and ticklish. They have a firmness and shape to them that is unique and they're very sensitive and prehensile and very easy to make feel good.

But most fetish people like weird-ass feet

Like feet that are broad and the wrong shape

Maybe they just had them as the most intimate contact they know

That's one of the reasons people like boobs so much even though they're really not much to look at.

People who weren't breast-fed but played with their mom's feet or got tickled a whole bunch or had special care taken to get good socks will inherently like feet more as an erogenous zone.

For regular people, it's like hand-holding but more special and less awkward. People will do all sorts of non-visual, unusually invasive and probing things with their feet, so it's nice to be able to have a relationship with someone when you have access to her footsies.

It's just a very primal and intimate thing, not something you think about often.

@Zephyr Blackfish Oh! That's something I've been meaning to talk about for a long time.
Girls being attractive comes down to two things: Nice, and pretty. You can only have one. If she has both she's faking at least one of them.
Girls who are nice are attractive on that basis and their positive features are magnified, a happy plump girl is far more attractive than a skinny bitch. If a girl is nice her looks won't matter, you'll like her anyway and want to love her for that reason.
Girls who are pretty are attractive on that basis, but often will not have a developed personality to match. This is the inferior choice.
This also applies to men, with two different attributes: Handsome, and strong. You can only have one, if you have both you're faking.
Women love strong men, and their inner strength shines through and gives them what they need even if they are a bit of a pork belly.
Women love handsome men because they think they might have some strength within them, but often this is macho or fake and leads to skinny bitch behavior.

**This is why nice guys and strong women are not attractive. They are playing by the wrong rules.**

https://youtu.be/iAPaVD83Gcc

@Jake the Exile well F for me being nice.

You were asking what the difference was between arousal and attraction and that's it

Porn desensitizes you to the pretty aspect and lets you focus more on nice. How much you value nice will then determine how you value women.

By nice guy I mean Nice Guy, the ones who emulate female behavior to appeal to females and then are surprised and angered by them not being attracted to that.

Being caring and considerate and loving your woman is a welcome bonus, you just need to learn the difference between nice and kind, and not to forsake your strength. That's what women need.

That is often why things go in circles when you try to play by a woman's rules, they don't want someone exactly like them. They want someone better than them.

It becomes a recursive loop and that's the source of all relationship troubles, not being man enough.

Oh no, I meant nice as in, y'know, occasionally doing favours, being polite, all that shit.
Although maybe it's just a case of being used as a side-man. Wouldn't surprise me tbh.

A real man would not allow his woman to cheat, he would go out of his way to set boundaries and provide for her.

For most men, "manning up" fails them because their instinct is to leave, but that betrays all the kindness that the woman thought you had.

So it becomes a balance.

All the shit I've done in the past and would do again.

That's the issue.

Ah fuck it, I'll figure my way out.

https://youtu.be/eUoMlyllriI

https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/11/germany-antifa-extremists-brutally-assault-female-real-estate-employee-in-her-own-home/

@Flavius Stilicho And the left pretends nothing has happened on Biden's part.

It much like Trump getting called out for everything done since being elected (even before taking office, i.e responsible literally for that Obama did). And after taking office, blamed for what Obama did, because there's no point in blaming Obama as he was no longer in office (ignore the fact that same people never called out Obama during his term).

Trump apparently is not allowed to investigate any Dem politician because it could be portrayed as personal interest. Meanwhile was was OK for Obama to wiretap Trump tower during 2016 election. And it was OK for biden to literally quid pro quo, but it's not OK to investigate it because it might look like quid pro quo on Trump's part.

then they say thats whataboutism

literally had that conversation

'why does bidens thing exonerate trump'

Repeat after me: It's not an either-or.

Ask them straight up, if the Bidens were bought off by Ukraine, would they really wanna know? Would they still support them? Would they let him get the nomination? Do they care about truth or just playing teams sports? Ask them starkly and see what they say.

When asked about Russia, most Trump-supporters thought it was a witch-hunt, but we were confident enough in our guy that we said, "Bring it on, you got nothing." Same with his taxes.

Yeah this is some serious partisanism anyone ever hear of this happening before, this seems like a new downward slide or maybe we just never been able to hear or see stuff like this before.

To be fair, it's nothing new. People did it with Reagan, Obama, Bubba Bill, Bush Jr. and probably many others

@Boop / 브파 / C'thUwU
'why does bidens thing exonerate trump'
...and then they continue to attack Trump and ignore Biden (despite biden still in the race and thus politically relevant) even within the assumption that Biden committed a crime (which should justify him being investigated and exonerate Trump).

Even when they admit Biden being wrong, they want to ignore it. Even when they admit Trump wanting investigation on a criminal they admit is worthy of investigating, investigating him is impeachable (if Trump).

The idea of "whataboutism" is about as ridiculous as "mansplaining" or "sealioning".

According to the left, even **factual** objections are invalid.