Oh right

He’s just effeminate

Lips are a bit strange though

he confused and needs things 'explained' to him

You see enough idiots playing the "beating on huwhitey as a huwhitey, then outing themselves as not considering themselves huwhite" game and sooner or later the hypocrisy gets to you.

<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>

White is PURE

Black is DEATH

change my mind

When does tucker Carlson go full race war

after it is over

AWWW. https://youtu.be/wgSZA3NPpBs?t=7052

When asked about Dark Matter, Tyson says , "we know it exists because we can perceive it's influence..." Wonder if he'd accept that rational for someone making an argument that GOD exists?

funny how he doesn't grasp the flaw in his OWN arguments... just the arguments of others

Well can we prove God’s influence?

not directly

Okay solved then

same thing with the existance of dark matter

Tyson has never really been all that great at science, he's more of a face man

I am not sure about that equivalence

We can measure the effect of gravity. Map it into an overall model of the universe

either way, there is just as much 'evidence' of God as there is 'dark matter'

The issue with dark matter is you’re being dishonest.

God we cant see we at best can infer without evidence

Sorry misread

the argument is flawed because they conclude that which causes the gravitational influence MUST be dark matter

Dark matter isn’t a discovered thing it’s an unknown given a name based on its effect

You said dark matter not gravity

But similar principle

same way the religious types argue for god

We dont know about dark matter but we do know there is measurably unseen matter and energy

not exactly

Unlike the immeasurable “God”

MA link a source for what you’re saying please

we know that we cannot account for all the energy and motion we observe

Let’s see if you really know anything or are just bullshitting here

that could just as well be a function of not completly understanding the influence; gravity

If you give sources which back up what you say I’ll admit I’m an idiot and you’re right

what aspect in particular?

Seems like a weird distinction to make. You say there is an unknown thing that might be able to be measured and thus you deem more credible. Vs something in the same caliber of mystery and our challenge/ability or prove it yet you claim it’s wrong?

all of what you are saying