Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 636148351255052298
It has a function in society
They go into a lot of studies, thats about it.
Men cannot feel so much empathy on average because it's a detrimental ability while hunting
Disagree.
rofl
Most women do not do animal testing, it's a male dominated area
Society doesent need men to have as much empathy, their gender role is that of a utility ,of protecter.
Yeah, research, science, and progression of technology is generally a male role.
I'm done, you're clearly rejecting science
Okay mister appeal to authority.
Science is not authority
Science is a METHOD
It's a practice
You DO science
You ARE not science
You sound mad
There is no appeal to authority
Lol
Yeah cause you're retarded
You should calm down my dude.
you're showing me studies based on a perceived authority on the subject, which indirectly helped me prove my point.
LOL
I'm starting to think you don't know what appeal to authority is.
I said, you're showing me studies based on a perceived authority on the subject, which indirectly helped me prove my point.
That's an appeal to authority.
Because it's an authority on the subject it can't possibly wrong, that's literarily your argument, even though it also put out the idea that I'm peddling, which you ignored.
aww, the site is down atm. I wanted to see if I was on it.
Two students charged for saying it
This is the “land of the free” everyone is trying to come to
Btw, considering that Petersonian truth is what benefits you, why does Peterson cry about his wife dying of cancer? That is not true. (I mean, you don't benefit from that cancer, suffering and death, so it's **NOT TRUE**.)
That's a real simplification of Peterson's ideas about figurative and literal truth but aight
Peterson doesn't claim to be das übermensch, he can still experience a human failure of reason in the case of an extreme trauma (if we accept your definition of his ideas)
So, you claim that it's reasonable to consider dying wife not dying? That he's being unreasonable in accepting literal truth?
Only if we accept your broken interpretation of his position on 'truth'
Even if he is breaking his own ideas, he's still a human being
I don't deny that. But how is my interpretation broken?