@Gservator is a little bitch.

Oh shit

>march

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pepegun:588019479401726001>

Corrected before you could point it out bitch

Get baited

No you didn't

She’s right

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pepegun:588019479401726001>

I can atest that he called it out before correction

Tbh anyone CAN edit it. It just gets changed within 10 minutes

Eh, Wikipedia still isn't authoritative.

Also it’s more so they don’t copy and paste without even reading it cause that wastes everyone’s time

@Nat someone wrote a story about how their history teacher would edit the wikipedia page of the topic of the page to purposefully screw kids over

and I believe 0 of that

just avoid political topics on Wikipedia

There we go, properly edited it

There's no strict edit policy on Wikipedia.

Only on certain pages are there securities.

Even if there were...

Who watches the watchers?

Though. Tbh, Wikipedia is a billion times more accurate than the textbooks from the 90s American schools use

imagine trusting wikipedia

fuck even I've done editing on wikipedia

There is a strict editing policy

but it's biased

There are also groups of leftists that go around “correcting” pages

anyway

in favour of Leftists

Well yes, for the most part. But specific pages about things are not fleshed out more often than not, and not peer reviewed by scholars that work in that field, making them unreliable, even if the information is generally accurate.

here's a good dose of Anime Carol Danvers

I think vice or some shit did a video on it

Wikipdia is really useful, but if you try to use something that anyone can fuck with as a proper source in academia you will be rightfully dunked on

dont use wikipedia for Political shit

especially if the subject is right-wing

i mean, be skeptical of all info tbh

Honestly, I will give that wikia is probably more accurate than most textbooks of the modern era..

Search gamergate