Message from @Nat
Discord ID: 638193265597743106
fuck even I've done editing on wikipedia
There is a strict editing policy
but it's biased
There are also groups of leftists that go around “correcting” pages
anyway
in favour of Leftists
Well yes, for the most part. But specific pages about things are not fleshed out more often than not, and not peer reviewed by scholars that work in that field, making them unreliable, even if the information is generally accurate.
here's a good dose of Anime Carol Danvers
I think vice or some shit did a video on it
Wikipdia is really useful, but if you try to use something that anyone can fuck with as a proper source in academia you will be rightfully dunked on
dont use wikipedia for Political shit
especially if the subject is right-wing
i mean, be skeptical of all info tbh
Honestly, I will give that wikia is probably more accurate than most textbooks of the modern era..
Search gamergate
I use Wikipedia just for their source pages for research papers.
on wikipedia
If Rey looked like this I wouldn't complain about the bad writing tbh
But as Boop said, all info is suspect.
better to teahc kids there is no 'UNLIMITED UNBIAS FULLY CORRECT' site anywhere
@Gservator agreed. curvy women can make me forgive anything
Well yeah.
Lmao
>iFunny watermark
<:powerful:595334910764515338> <:shank:288074213393301504>
Bitchy masculine girl in spandex type shit that could beat me up <:ahegao:462286952335671296>
This pic has meme potential
The sad thing is she’d “rape” you then accuse you of rape 😔
furry lives dont matter
This is cute
Furry propaganda is punishable by celling, followed by flogging.
what if the dems arte intentionally trying to tank themselves, so the vote is like 35-65, and they investigate why trump got so many votes
and they made like a million votes from dead people to be for trump
and theyre like REPUBS USING DEAD PEOPLE TO GET ELECTED