Message from @Coolitic
Discord ID: 635555099459977216
no
I imagine in some desperate and horrific alternate reality it would be more moral to kill children than let them live because of the quality of living
lel
Yes
also
It's very environment based
they are one's BELEIF of what is right and wrong
imagine asking the Georgian for help
u can steal something which is against ethics but u can steal for good cause and it will make ur action moral but unethical non the less
@ManAnimal so are the laws of physics
incorrect
If 9/10 children were born horribly disfigured with no chance of a real life
for a law to be a law ALL observations must agree
not so with morality
subjective observation applies to anything
Is it moral to put them down or force them with medical science to live as long as possible
Morality is malleable depending on environmental factors
there is no greater purpose in life
to find true morality and then execute it
it is
'all subjective observations in agreement ' = objective observation
the case
literally
this is why i don't think you took philosophy
Interesting tbh
the act of finding the right thing to do
it's basic epistemology
and then doing the right thing to do
morals are purely pragmatic tho tbh nietzsche noticed it
This is the big brain 200 iq debates I came to this sever for
Server**
<:milkshake:580828838066651146>
ethics are before shit goes down but morals is where its at
subjective vs objective; one is the lowest common denominator of the other
doing the right thing, is, by definition, the best course of action
not hard to understand, bucko
'best' by what CRITERIA?
Listen, you degenerates
Got my attention
Anarcho-fascism is the only true path