Message from @Tato
Discord ID: 635554710098673692
ethics tend to be looser, and more based on appearance, the former because there is contention, and the latter because it is applied to strangers first and foremost
ethics are a function of concensus
yessir
morals are an individual choice
of morals applied to society
😉
have you ever taken a philosophy course?
sadly, yes
Morals are inherently tied to a society rather than being implicit by nature though
ethics are social norm
morals determine whats right and just which doesnt always align with ethics
In Islam it's immoral to be a fag
hmmm... you sound more religous than acadmic
Over here it's immoral to be a fag basher
morals go start at the individual, stop at wider society
ethics start at wider society, end at the individual
yes, it's a 'relative measure'
and that agreement totally contraditcts the previous argument
morals are what is right and wrong, PERIOD
ethics are expectations
no
I imagine in some desperate and horrific alternate reality it would be more moral to kill children than let them live because of the quality of living
lel
Yes
also
It's very environment based
they are one's BELEIF of what is right and wrong
imagine asking the Georgian for help
u can steal something which is against ethics but u can steal for good cause and it will make ur action moral but unethical non the less
@ManAnimal so are the laws of physics
incorrect
If 9/10 children were born horribly disfigured with no chance of a real life
for a law to be a law ALL observations must agree
not so with morality
subjective observation applies to anything
Is it moral to put them down or force them with medical science to live as long as possible
Morality is malleable depending on environmental factors
there is no greater purpose in life
to find true morality and then execute it
it is
by definition