to find true morality and then execute it

it is

by definition

'all subjective observations in agreement ' = objective observation

the case

literally

this is why i don't think you took philosophy

Interesting tbh

the act of finding the right thing to do

it's basic epistemology

and then doing the right thing to do

morals are purely pragmatic tho tbh nietzsche noticed it

This is the big brain 200 iq debates I came to this sever for

Server**

<:milkshake:580828838066651146>

ethics are before shit goes down but morals is where its at

subjective vs objective; one is the lowest common denominator of the other

doing the right thing, is, by definition, the best course of action

not hard to understand, bucko

'best' by what CRITERIA?

Listen, you degenerates

Got my attention

Anarcho-fascism is the only true path

by whatever criteria in which you came up with what you believed to be the best

that is a receipe for circular morality

Anarcho

Fascism

<:powerful:595334910764515338> <:powerful:595334910764515338>

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991> <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

Qu1) Is it wrong to lie?

It is generally wrong to lie

I think capitalistic communism is the true path

Yes, we must get rid of the state so that the state will not prevent us from extolling the virtues of a strong state

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

generally is unacceptable

yes or no

too bad

<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>

Is it *always* wrong to lie? no

not true coolitic