Message from @eyebrows
Discord ID: 638787772852862986
@Marushia Dark well ok it’s innate their confused about themselves
no actually wikipedia says there are more genders than there are stars in our galaxy
*The term Fixed Action Pattern (FAP), or Modal Action Pattern (MAP), is sometimes used in ethology to denote an instinctive behavioral sequence that is relatively invariant within the species and almost inevitably runs to completion.[1]
Fixed action patterns, or similar behaviour sequences, are produced by a neural network known as the innate releasing mechanism in response to an external sensory stimulus known as a sign stimulus or releaser. A fixed action pattern is one of the few types of behaviors which is thought to be "hard-wired" and instinctive.*
I see it more as miswiring
if you wish to subscribe to the statiscal based, flawed analysis of behaviour, be my guest
Mother Nature connected the audio port to the video outlet and vice versa
I feel like my behavior to get turned on from bittys is natural
Who the fuck did I learn it from?
@Marushia Dark hmmm maybe. I still wouldn’t call innate behavior in that it obviously seems like an outlier.
it's a complex differential; not algebra
@eyebrows she'll keep bringing it up forever until she can't get victim points for it
MA, he's citing the fucking dictionary. You've only got your own rhetoric supporting you.
you lack the tools
@Marushia Dark but people conflate it because the concept is more ideological morale question now.
Is MA denying words again
yes
Don't bother trying to argue
again, he is quoting the EXACT same sources that support interesctionality
these are flawed
Wikipedia isn't a source.
It's a source of sources.
meaning it's a source
The people who came up with this are not the same people who came up with intersectionality.
funny how the composite argument works for you but not against you
@ubermensch It's nuanced. There are forms that are and forms that aren't. Like gluten-free. There are people who have cyliac disease and then there are people who like to claim they're gluten free but have no biological intolerance for it. They do it to virtue signal or to lose weight or whatever.
What I mean is
I’d say intersectionality in of itself is not even a foundational idea. Considering how fucking shaky they make it.
No one cites Wikipedia
differntials have more than one component
they cite the condensed version of the studies that support them
Wikipedia is the vehicle not the passenger
examine the studies THEMSELVES
look for FALISFICATION, requared to make a study legit science
fuck off I'm not paying $40 for a study to fight an argument on Sargon's discord
you WILL NOT find an y
Dude, you're reaching, given that I linked to a science article before and you called it pseudo-science without explanation
@Marushia Dark well that means their just arguing for subjectivism in their ideas. Because if it’s subjective it can always change and you can’t argue against it lol.
I'm confused
you want me to prove the theory is false to cite it as proof