Message from @Bastard Ferret
Discord ID: 623555506090541086
it's not as if a homosexual relationship is required for anal sex... that's just how the article puts it
anyway, given that... i think it's real.
Likely is. its more taking a weird bit of Canadian law and making it fit with the rest. I hate the guy personally, but aim the attacks at things he actually does wrong as opposed to moral puritanism. If he was dropping it below the general age of consent I would be more worried (say 14 or 12).
when did this channel come back?
@Bastard Ferret the age of consent in canada depends, 15-17 can sleep with people 5 years older than them, then 18 are adults
We were just invisible due to our close proximity to the US-POL server.
ok
@flikersprigs well, as i said. i was quoting the article. generally what they said looked plausible, and was consistent with what i had heard. many places have "romeo and juliet" clauses. that's not unique to ca, i don't think
Well from what I remember of the law, it doesn't exclude anal sex
read the entire canadian criminal code, have you? there's always one...
here...
...
Anal intercourse
159 (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between
(a) husband and wife, or
(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,
both of whom consent to the act.
@flikersprigs don't LARP as a lawywer, especially if you don't know what you're talking about.
if you really *are* a laywer. well... yikes.
I'm not
I've read the law regarding age of consent
>Talking about age of consent
>Anime profile picture
>Here we go again
and I don't recall it differentiating between regular sex and anal sex
kek.
ok
it was somewhere else. the video edit might still be dishonest. but anal sex consent is defintely defined as 18 for non married persons
but given what i know about justin "peoplekind" trudaeu, it's plausible. that's all i'm sayin' 🙂
honestly I wouldn't be surprised if we're both correct and the law just contradicts itself
actually I'd be willing to bet that's the case
i'll be honest, i *am* surprised that canada has a sodomy law
well, you were correct that the age of consent law does not mention anal sex
wait.. no
it's up above
i suck at navigating this web site.
it's all right there on the page i linked.
i suppose if you're see anal sex as just another sexual act, it's contradictory. if you see it as riskier, or degenerate or something... then there is something to it *shrug* i won't weigh in here. i'm just trying to find the facts.
ok
so something interesting
theoretically, you can have anal sex with someone thats 14 or 15 if you're under 19 or 20
but
if you have anal sex with soemone 16 or 17 its a crime
entirely because of the contradicting laws
i think you meant to say, you can have *vaginal* intercourse with a 14 year old if you're 19, but it's a crime if they are 17 and you have anal (unless you are married). that's how i understand it.
something tells me fringe cases like that wouldn't be prosecuted by the state. (or crown, or whatever the fuck it is you leafs have)
trudeu is just looking for another legislative virtue feather to put in his cap (ok, now i suppose i'm weighing in)