Message from @Weez

Discord ID: 625090161578999848


2019-09-21 22:03:25 UTC  

not that it matters to me

2019-09-21 22:03:32 UTC  

Just pass it through Parliament

2019-09-21 22:03:34 UTC  

"

Eleven years after the St. Paul case, the U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue of cross-burning after three people were arrested separately for violating a similar Virginia ban.

In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Supreme Court held that while cross-burning may constitute illegal intimidation in some cases, a ban on the public burning of crosses would violate the First Amendment.

"[A] State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation," O'Connor wrote, "that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm." As a caveat, the justices noted, such acts can be prosecuted if the intent is proven, something not done in this case."

2019-09-21 22:03:37 UTC  

the pc shit is mostly south end

2019-09-21 22:03:38 UTC  

Virginia v. Black (2003)

2019-09-21 22:04:02 UTC  

That is an action

2019-09-21 22:04:04 UTC  

Not words

2019-09-21 22:04:07 UTC  

Speech non the less.

2019-09-21 22:04:10 UTC  

Just pass it through parliament™️

2019-09-21 22:04:10 UTC  

^^^^^^^^^^

2019-09-21 22:04:12 UTC  

IT IS LITERALLY

2019-09-21 22:04:13 UTC  

Moving the goalposts now.

2019-09-21 22:04:14 UTC  

Count Dankula was convicted over words alone

2019-09-21 22:04:14 UTC  

A DEED

2019-09-21 22:04:18 UTC  

NOT A WORD

2019-09-21 22:04:29 UTC  

Deeds are speech <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-21 22:04:35 UTC  

Ok, If it is passed through Parliament it becomes statute law and the courts have to apply it

2019-09-21 22:04:35 UTC  

Your supreme court agrees it is

2019-09-21 22:04:59 UTC  

once again the goalposts have shifted

2019-09-21 22:05:04 UTC  

We just need one bill proclaiming Hate Speech to be Free Speech and we are fine

2019-09-21 22:05:08 UTC  

By you, sure.

2019-09-21 22:05:22 UTC  

An action that doesn't physically affect anyone is basically speech

2019-09-21 22:05:23 UTC  

you have literally shifted the goalposts from freedom of speech to crimerates

2019-09-21 22:05:36 UTC  

Burning a Cross is different to being arrested over words alone

2019-09-21 22:05:39 UTC  

"Instead, the Supreme Court has chosen to impose narrowly tailored limits on speech that is regarded as hateful"

2019-09-21 22:05:41 UTC  

There you have it.

2019-09-21 22:05:57 UTC  

Even the supreme court agrees there are limits on your speech and that there are hate speech limitations.

2019-09-21 22:05:59 UTC  

<a:clapping:597808588286722053>

2019-09-21 22:06:00 UTC  

then when you came back to freedom of speech, you used an example that was convicted based on cross burning, which is an action

2019-09-21 22:06:03 UTC  

Shall we continue?

2019-09-21 22:06:08 UTC  

Again still Freer then the UK

2019-09-21 22:06:15 UTC  

2.1 million people in prison

2019-09-21 22:06:18 UTC  

Sorry, it's not buddy

2019-09-21 22:06:23 UTC  

In terms of Free Speech

2019-09-21 22:06:32 UTC  

that is obsurd

2019-09-21 22:06:35 UTC  

I will admit you found a case of it

2019-09-21 22:06:44 UTC  

But how often does that occur compared to the UK

2019-09-21 22:06:44 UTC  

It is, he's a libertarian. @Sillius Soddus

2019-09-21 22:06:49 UTC  

What do you expect?

2019-09-21 22:06:50 UTC  

'' The most precious possession you have in the world is your own people. ''

2019-09-21 22:06:51 UTC  

Partially