Message from @The Electric Lizard
Discord ID: 625092217429688342
Starting to sound like Monty Python
Look very simply people should be allowed to say whatever they want, There should be no speech codes whatsoever, and i believe the US is closer to this then the UK
The us has more freedom units per capita than the uk
The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress.
Well inciting violence should still be a crime
This is from the UK
Inciting distress is a crime under this
It shouldn't be
person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he—
(a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,
Depends on the level of distress which is the issue
^
They are basing a conviction based purely on intent
And you’d need evidence to support that intent
Who can ever determine intent?
You can't it is based purely on the opinion of the Judge
Which is why it's hard to be convicted of hate speech
That law is so vague
Yep
Ye
Oh definitely
Literally anything can be insulting, it's up to an individual's opinion
Convicting people over jokes is a bad case to go especially in the UK legal system
Dankular should have been classed as comedy/satire
Which is protected
That my friends is a precursor to a 1984 style world
Because the UK uses common law the Dankula case can be used as a precedent to arrest other comedians
Hence why a rapper can hold up Boris' bloody head and call it a joke
Surely that is a crime
Apparently not for him
certainly causing distress
With intent
He's rich and powerful whereas we're not
But i doubt the police care enough
Yup
unlike in the Dankula case
Because dankular is a commoner
It's all about class, status, power and money
The law is far to vague too
It always has been