What exactly regulates the effect a woman's body will allow for a male sperm that did not impregnate the egg to affect the fetus' egg

What I’m gathering though is that sexual contact changes behavior

And you want to study that

It definitely does

Yes!

Here's one I have a particular interest in

Another thing you said is something about how tribes had some sort of communication we can’t understand

A “meta personality”

Most pedophiles are gay and most of those people were traumatized as a kid

Or disproportionally pedophiles are gay, data is not clear because of how good that subculture is at hiding things

And the greeks and the afghans all had/have cultural understandings in their "metapersonality" that once you penetrate a young man, he will become more passive and more feminine

Define meta personality

It’s confusing to me

And then if you look at things in reproductive strategy, say you have a polygynous society, with one man for many females, but then we have a birth rate of about 50/50, one solution is obviously to make some of the people born as males act as women in society, so there exists a trigger in men that can be activated through assault or romantic engagement with an older man

Metapersonality

Well like

Imagine your family

OR anyone's family

There are the individual personalities that make up you, your dad, your mother, and anyone else

But how you act as individuals stack up if you look at your family as a single entity, kind of how like your body is one entity but really of disparate cells, a multicellular construct, the same way any organization is a multi-personal construct

And so the personality that emerges, how the organization, or family, or tribe, interacts, sees, articulates, thinks of itself, is dictated by certain patterns that can be studied either as a result of the individual personalities, or simply of the whole thing

So if you over a hundred years have different people realizing that monogamous relationships usually mean most men get a woman, meaning most men are satisfied enough to cause less issues, well maybe the meta personality realizes it's a good idea to have monogamous relationships as an ideal for young men and women to aspire to

And so it becomes the way individual personalities, like say you, or me, when growing up, are preprogrammed to act in accordance to the previously established pathways

Interesting, it’s like Carl Jungs collective consciences in some since

Sort of, yes

However Carl talked more about the past still living on in our psyche

The collective unconscious is more the thing in its instance rather than throughout time though

Well the past lives in our psyche because our psyche inhabits the meta personality

And everything that affects something in a continuity tends to remain until it's contradicted one too many times

The question is how to get individualism and collectivism working hand in hand, that’s my deal

Our collective unconscious, meta-personality, it knows things that we just don't because it's simply observed with higher processing power for a longer time in different scenarios

True, the subconscious

well what are you calling individualism and collectivism

That’s difficult, the definitions change all the time

Well you must've meant something when you thought it

Which definitions did you mean

I guess individualism would be the individual working for himself, and collectivism would be the collective working for itself

Does it not already work hand in hand?

How to get a individual to help the collective and himself at the same time is my question

I think the short answer to your question is flow

Top down or bottom up?