But even in the few polygamous traditionalist societies, monogamy was generally the norm, except for kings

It's why I cum on every surface on women I fuck without cumming inside their actual organ for reproduction

Yeah that one is true Ford

Lmao

But there you have the issue of the fact that generally the elite drove intellectual and cultural discussion

Islam is a prime example of that

Back then information didn’t trickle down like now days

Their Christ figure is literally a warlord who had almost a dozen wives

More reasons why Feminism has ruined society

But most muslims are in monogamous relationships and are pretty cucked in general

Python, information trickled down only in non obvious ways

The meta personality that was formed from a tribe made observations, postulations and then confirmed those things over periods of thousands to hundreds of years through different eyes and mouths to articulate it in a feedback loop with

So they acted upon these things without articulating them in the same manner we do, and so they did understand it just in the same way that despite us having all the data for it, we don't

Which is quite ironic

What I want a study on is

If you take virgins, and cum in their mouths or anus respectively, not both for the same subject, and then compare that data with just generally slutty people who interact sexually, who has the most impact?

And does that impact correspond to genetics purely, or does a behaviour/action trigger the genetics, or is it just a common gene that we all have that is completely decided by environment

Yeah I’m having a hard time keeping up with you, you’re going into unfamiliar subjects, sorry.

What exactly regulates the effect a woman's body will allow for a male sperm that did not impregnate the egg to affect the fetus' egg

What I’m gathering though is that sexual contact changes behavior

And you want to study that

It definitely does

Yes!

Here's one I have a particular interest in

Another thing you said is something about how tribes had some sort of communication we can’t understand

A “meta personality”

Most pedophiles are gay and most of those people were traumatized as a kid

Or disproportionally pedophiles are gay, data is not clear because of how good that subculture is at hiding things

And the greeks and the afghans all had/have cultural understandings in their "metapersonality" that once you penetrate a young man, he will become more passive and more feminine

Define meta personality

It’s confusing to me

And then if you look at things in reproductive strategy, say you have a polygynous society, with one man for many females, but then we have a birth rate of about 50/50, one solution is obviously to make some of the people born as males act as women in society, so there exists a trigger in men that can be activated through assault or romantic engagement with an older man

Metapersonality

Well like

Imagine your family

OR anyone's family

There are the individual personalities that make up you, your dad, your mother, and anyone else

But how you act as individuals stack up if you look at your family as a single entity, kind of how like your body is one entity but really of disparate cells, a multicellular construct, the same way any organization is a multi-personal construct

And so the personality that emerges, how the organization, or family, or tribe, interacts, sees, articulates, thinks of itself, is dictated by certain patterns that can be studied either as a result of the individual personalities, or simply of the whole thing

So if you over a hundred years have different people realizing that monogamous relationships usually mean most men get a woman, meaning most men are satisfied enough to cause less issues, well maybe the meta personality realizes it's a good idea to have monogamous relationships as an ideal for young men and women to aspire to

And so it becomes the way individual personalities, like say you, or me, when growing up, are preprogrammed to act in accordance to the previously established pathways