Message from @Gustav Göran The beautiful
Discord ID: 628263286831317012
Although, that video titles is clickbait, that woman isn't a 'witness' of anything. The obvious implication of the title is that she's a gun violence survivor.
Come on. Then next you are calling it BS, that Jehova's Witnesses haven't personally seen God.
Some limit, please.
@British Cigarette Wouldn't the same argument go for less obvious things? A very high iq person together with a very low one could be seen as manipulation because of an implicit position of authority. Age goes the same way, unless there is some genuine explicit case of authority such being someone's boss or something. While it might be weird for a 40 year old to be with a 16 year old, or a genius to be with someone mentally handicapped (Like the chap with an iq below 50 in the uk who was banned from having sex for being so retarded), why is that "manipulation" necessarily wrong or different from just a guy with more than adequate social skills who persuades, or manipulates depending on how you see it, a girl to sleep with him or be in a relationship with him?
I always called them rooftop Koreans
-> A woman's body incorporates DNA from her casual sex partners. The mother's offspring can inherit genes from her previous sexual partners.
->Male microchimerism is a form of epigenetics wherein females incorporate male DNA from previous sexual partners and then exhibit that DNA in future offspring they have with completely different males. /// There is lots of evidenece, but why isn't this being studied more? ///
->"Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. [However,] -Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons."
->"Besides known pregnancies, other sources of male microchimerism may include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse."
->"Danish girls aged 10–15 years. A total of 154 girls were studied of which 21 (13.6%) tested positive for male microchimerism. Girls were more likely to test positive if their mothers previously had received transfusion, given birth to a son or had had a spontaneous abortion. However, less than half of microchimerism positivity was attributable to these factors."
->The oldest girls were more likely to test positive.
->"Male microchimerism in young girls may originate from an older brother either full born or from a discontinued pregnancy or from transfusion during pregnancy. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources of male cells likely exist in young girls."
Sources:
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458919/
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC40117/
> http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/100/8/2845?sso-checked=true
> http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
> http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(05)00270-6/fulltext
> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19381956.2016.1218583
No wonder most traditionalist cultures throughout the world put a woman's virginity and monogamy on a pedestal
I don't think that's strictly true though
Most traditionalist cultures are polygamist?
Although most of the people within said cultures are in monogamous relationships
Or wait what defines traditionalist
Okay, to rephrase my statement, most traditionalist cultures valued monogamy of a woman and ostracized whores
So wait, females can take DNA from past sexual partners, not just the one that impregnated them?
Yeah that one is for sure true
I did not know that
But even in the few polygamous traditionalist societies, monogamy was generally the norm, except for kings
It's why I cum on every surface on women I fuck without cumming inside their actual organ for reproduction
Yeah that one is true Ford
Lmao
But there you have the issue of the fact that generally the elite drove intellectual and cultural discussion
Back then information didn’t trickle down like now days
Their Christ figure is literally a warlord who had almost a dozen wives
More reasons why Feminism has ruined society
But most muslims are in monogamous relationships and are pretty cucked in general
Python, information trickled down only in non obvious ways
The meta personality that was formed from a tribe made observations, postulations and then confirmed those things over periods of thousands to hundreds of years through different eyes and mouths to articulate it in a feedback loop with
So they acted upon these things without articulating them in the same manner we do, and so they did understand it just in the same way that despite us having all the data for it, we don't
Which is quite ironic
What I want a study on is
If you take virgins, and cum in their mouths or anus respectively, not both for the same subject, and then compare that data with just generally slutty people who interact sexually, who has the most impact?
And does that impact correspond to genetics purely, or does a behaviour/action trigger the genetics, or is it just a common gene that we all have that is completely decided by environment
Yeah I’m having a hard time keeping up with you, you’re going into unfamiliar subjects, sorry.
What exactly regulates the effect a woman's body will allow for a male sperm that did not impregnate the egg to affect the fetus' egg
What I’m gathering though is that sexual contact changes behavior
And you want to study that
It definitely does
Yes!
Here's one I have a particular interest in
Another thing you said is something about how tribes had some sort of communication we can’t understand
A “meta personality”