Message from @Gustav Göran The beautiful

Discord ID: 628263286831317012


2019-09-30 14:39:50 UTC  

Although, that video titles is clickbait, that woman isn't a 'witness' of anything. The obvious implication of the title is that she's a gun violence survivor.

2019-09-30 15:42:01 UTC  

Come on. Then next you are calling it BS, that Jehova's Witnesses haven't personally seen God.

2019-09-30 15:42:09 UTC  

Some limit, please.

2019-09-30 16:04:32 UTC  

@British Cigarette Wouldn't the same argument go for less obvious things? A very high iq person together with a very low one could be seen as manipulation because of an implicit position of authority. Age goes the same way, unless there is some genuine explicit case of authority such being someone's boss or something. While it might be weird for a 40 year old to be with a 16 year old, or a genius to be with someone mentally handicapped (Like the chap with an iq below 50 in the uk who was banned from having sex for being so retarded), why is that "manipulation" necessarily wrong or different from just a guy with more than adequate social skills who persuades, or manipulates depending on how you see it, a girl to sleep with him or be in a relationship with him?

2019-09-30 16:10:26 UTC  

I always called them rooftop Koreans

2019-09-30 16:10:32 UTC  

-> A woman's body incorporates DNA from her casual sex partners. The mother's offspring can inherit genes from her previous sexual partners.

->Male microchimerism is a form of epigenetics wherein females incorporate male DNA from previous sexual partners and then exhibit that DNA in future offspring they have with completely different males. /// There is lots of evidenece, but why isn't this being studied more? ///

->"Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. [However,] -Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons."

->"Besides known pregnancies, other sources of male microchimerism may include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse."

->"Danish girls aged 10–15 years. A total of 154 girls were studied of which 21 (13.6%) tested positive for male microchimerism. Girls were more likely to test positive if their mothers previously had received transfusion, given birth to a son or had had a spontaneous abortion. However, less than half of microchimerism positivity was attributable to these factors."

->The oldest girls were more likely to test positive.

->"Male microchimerism in young girls may originate from an older brother either full born or from a discontinued pregnancy or from transfusion during pregnancy. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources of male cells likely exist in young girls."

Sources:

> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458919/
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC40117/
> http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/100/8/2845?sso-checked=true
> http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
> http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(05)00270-6/fulltext
> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19381956.2016.1218583

2019-09-30 16:10:36 UTC  

No wonder most traditionalist cultures throughout the world put a woman's virginity and monogamy on a pedestal

2019-09-30 16:10:57 UTC  

I don't think that's strictly true though

2019-09-30 16:11:05 UTC  

Most traditionalist cultures are polygamist?

2019-09-30 16:11:13 UTC  

Although most of the people within said cultures are in monogamous relationships

2019-09-30 16:12:18 UTC  

Or wait what defines traditionalist

2019-09-30 16:12:20 UTC  

Okay, to rephrase my statement, most traditionalist cultures valued monogamy of a woman and ostracized whores

2019-09-30 16:12:24 UTC  

So wait, females can take DNA from past sexual partners, not just the one that impregnated them?

2019-09-30 16:12:32 UTC  

Yeah that one is for sure true

2019-09-30 16:12:40 UTC  

I did not know that

2019-09-30 16:12:59 UTC  

But even in the few polygamous traditionalist societies, monogamy was generally the norm, except for kings

2019-09-30 16:13:07 UTC  

It's why I cum on every surface on women I fuck without cumming inside their actual organ for reproduction

2019-09-30 16:13:25 UTC  

Yeah that one is true Ford

2019-09-30 16:13:36 UTC  

Lmao

2019-09-30 16:13:39 UTC  

But there you have the issue of the fact that generally the elite drove intellectual and cultural discussion

2019-09-30 16:14:00 UTC  

Islam is a prime example of that

2019-09-30 16:14:05 UTC  

Back then information didn’t trickle down like now days

2019-09-30 16:14:12 UTC  

Their Christ figure is literally a warlord who had almost a dozen wives

2019-09-30 16:14:19 UTC  

More reasons why Feminism has ruined society

2019-09-30 16:14:20 UTC  

But most muslims are in monogamous relationships and are pretty cucked in general

2019-09-30 16:14:33 UTC  

Python, information trickled down only in non obvious ways

2019-09-30 16:15:08 UTC  

The meta personality that was formed from a tribe made observations, postulations and then confirmed those things over periods of thousands to hundreds of years through different eyes and mouths to articulate it in a feedback loop with

2019-09-30 16:15:53 UTC  

So they acted upon these things without articulating them in the same manner we do, and so they did understand it just in the same way that despite us having all the data for it, we don't

2019-09-30 16:15:58 UTC  

Which is quite ironic

2019-09-30 16:16:30 UTC  

What I want a study on is

2019-09-30 16:17:06 UTC  

If you take virgins, and cum in their mouths or anus respectively, not both for the same subject, and then compare that data with just generally slutty people who interact sexually, who has the most impact?

2019-09-30 16:17:42 UTC  

And does that impact correspond to genetics purely, or does a behaviour/action trigger the genetics, or is it just a common gene that we all have that is completely decided by environment

2019-09-30 16:18:43 UTC  

Yeah I’m having a hard time keeping up with you, you’re going into unfamiliar subjects, sorry.

2019-09-30 16:18:47 UTC  

What exactly regulates the effect a woman's body will allow for a male sperm that did not impregnate the egg to affect the fetus' egg

2019-09-30 16:18:57 UTC  

What I’m gathering though is that sexual contact changes behavior

2019-09-30 16:19:06 UTC  

And you want to study that

2019-09-30 16:19:06 UTC  

It definitely does

2019-09-30 16:19:09 UTC  

Yes!

2019-09-30 16:19:21 UTC  

Here's one I have a particular interest in

2019-09-30 16:19:30 UTC  

Another thing you said is something about how tribes had some sort of communication we can’t understand

2019-09-30 16:19:41 UTC  

A “meta personality”