No capral tunnel
The most adjustable keyboard there ever was
Each hand gets to sit at whatever angle you deem comfy
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/498661715207127062/623877050872102937/image0.jpg
>qwerty
Heck, they can sit on the sides of your table if that's how your hands feel morst comfy
qwerty sucks
it is literally a holdover of the telegraph era
It just persisted because people got used to the typewriter layout
There was no research for it beyond relocating letters so far from each other that the arms of the typewriter would not hit each-other
That's literally it
There is exponentially more research in Dvorak and Colemak
Those were actually derivatives of some thought
And I'm telling you that there's accidental efficiency in some slant because a hand-aligned up from F gets you R and T 's corner and a hand-aligned down gets you C and V's' corners.
B.eggs have to go
The degree of slant on a typewriter is retarded
Slant is not efficiency
but no slant is just as retarded
It is literally dictated by mechanical layout
because it's not hand-aligned movement
No ergonomics
LITERALLY THE ERGONOMIC MOVEMENT LANDS YOU AT THE CORNER OF TWO BUTTONS
NO SLANT MEANS YOU GET ONE BUTTON
HOW IS ONE > TWO
This diagramm is from a book on human ergonomics in device design
It is a guideline for button placement in vehicles like BOBCAT
That is how fingers move
I give up, Because no it's not. The pinky is the giveaway that that diagram is dead wrong
Why it is not in the typing guidelines I don't know
Pinky reaches go up and *out*
@🐈I Love Kiara 🐈 honestly if those 4 choices were there i would get rid of womens rights
because you have to rotate your hand to do them
@Eirshy you are arguing with professors of physiology
That's rich
And you're arguing with an engineer who can physically demonstrate it in front of his own face
Next thing you will say is that crutches are not meant for walking
In theory theory is the same as practice
In practice, fuck off
Yll you did is argue from familiarity
