Message from @Coolitic
Discord ID: 627294535269089350
hence why they dont snip snip
The adoption of the OT as canon to the NT was a move by early messianic Jews to give more legitimacy to the early Church
sell your cape and take up a sword
@Coolitic Which only reinforces the fact that Bible is self-contradictory.
Jesus was against the church
And as such, not credible.
Jesus was against the Temple
no
there was no church Jesus was a jew
it doesnt
because ppl write the Bible
eh, rejection is way too strong. nothing in NT says old hebrew customs =bad. it does say they mean squat tho
God does not get his magic pen and write the book
The goyim gets it
The Bible is basically patch notes to the OT
he was against the money lenders in the temple
not the temple
so shittier circumstances of the world resulted in less-than-ideal morals and methods
@Sectator Pragmaticam Lex Which passage of NT says OT means squat?
patch notes, yes. good analogy
@4SidedTriangle he openly rebuked the law-giving institution of the temple
Do remember that https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-17.htm argues otherwise, that it *does* mean quite something.
something something along the lines of
old hebrew customs, not all OT
"abandon old tradition, u are saved"
Also
and recall
as in specific rituals and whatnot
that not all actions taken in the OT were considered good actions
^^^^^
What are differences between "old Hebrew tradition" and "old Testament"? Both are old. And both are Hebrew.
@UnfilteredGarbage then the argument becomes what is the temple is it the people or the building or the concept and ideal
hence why a lot of "protagonists" in the OT ended up getting their shit kicked in later for their stupid shit
Most of the OT are traditions of the Jewish tribes, which don't apply to Christian gentiles, since they aren't of the "chosen people" anyways
circumcision for an ez example
the so called "christians" then are not the same Christians now as Christianity has been nooterd. after the invasion of islam and the sacking of the last great chrisitan city.
The most Jesus could have meant is distance from those parts of Hebrew tradition **NOT WRITTEN INTO OT**.
no
Hence all stoning is agreed by Jesus.
he said circumcision