Message from @BrandonChimaria (。◕‿◕。✿)

Discord ID: 627719741171302401


2019-09-29 04:11:58 UTC  

which identifies a customer?

2019-09-29 04:12:00 UTC  

the time and skill they put into it

2019-09-29 04:12:20 UTC  

if it didnt identify a customer

2019-09-29 04:12:24 UTC  

there would be no purpose to it

2019-09-29 04:12:34 UTC  

and it would make a game impossible to play for everyone

2019-09-29 04:12:38 UTC  

spoilers

2019-09-29 04:12:39 UTC  

For DRM to positively identify a customer, it must be able to identify your legal purchase, meaning having a record of the transaction AND the ability to match you do it

2019-09-29 04:12:40 UTC  

not really as we have seen it is more profitable to do shit like release shitty games to market and charge for incremential updates

2019-09-29 04:12:43 UTC  

you can buy gears of war 5

2019-09-29 04:12:47 UTC  

and the DRM says ayy ok

2019-09-29 04:12:48 UTC  

If that's what you demand, then expect it eventually

2019-09-29 04:13:02 UTC  

gone are the days of massive, front-end development

2019-09-29 04:13:05 UTC  

too risky

2019-09-29 04:13:10 UTC  

@ManAnimal perhaps they'd have more if there was less pirating

2019-09-29 04:13:15 UTC  

<:thinkcide:462282415549841409>

2019-09-29 04:13:21 UTC  

Okay really alt tabbing back to MHW, I feel like I'm trying to argue 2A with demonrats atm, the level of speaking without knowing what the fuck they're talking about is hilariously high.

2019-09-29 04:13:22 UTC  

doubtful

2019-09-29 04:13:34 UTC  

they aren't going to that model because they are losing money

2019-09-29 04:13:37 UTC  

There is no Constitutional right to free shit.

2019-09-29 04:13:37 UTC  

pretentious, more like

2019-09-29 04:14:13 UTC  

they are going to that model because of the inherent risk of developing an elaborate game like No Man's Sky and having it not sell

2019-09-29 04:14:17 UTC  

"oh, i was in the military, i know everything about why we're in iraq and its either terrible or wonderful, dont think for yourself"

2019-09-29 04:14:23 UTC  

literally what you sound like

2019-09-29 04:14:35 UTC  

It's noble if you obtain a "demo version" and then *actually pay for it* but that's a matter of faith in humanity innit?

2019-09-29 04:15:12 UTC  

much easier to feel out the market with a hastily made alpha version then realse incremental and paid upgrades

2019-09-29 04:15:14 UTC  

so lessons learned here (i guess):
devs should make demos great again
whoever invents a better DRM will get boatloads of money

2019-09-29 04:15:26 UTC  

and what that model, DRM is just stupid

2019-09-29 04:15:28 UTC  

Gamers are right to distrust dev greed or bad DRMs, and devs are right to distrust a market economy premised on the honor system

2019-09-29 04:15:51 UTC  

either the honor system, or the uninformed buyer system

2019-09-29 04:16:13 UTC  

nah, blockchain based will probably next

2019-09-29 04:16:24 UTC  

Maybe.

2019-09-29 04:16:40 UTC  

I really don't understand blockchain itself well enough to comment.

2019-09-29 04:16:43 UTC  

great potential for paid transactions of game assets using independant markets

2019-09-29 04:17:07 UTC  

as well as intergrated DRM and payment

2019-09-29 04:17:45 UTC  

also potential for data-economy applications

2019-09-29 04:18:05 UTC  

such as sharing game experience data collected from game-play

2019-09-29 04:18:18 UTC  

real-time strategy guides

2019-09-29 04:20:31 UTC  

*remembers when "real-time strategy guide" meant calling the Sierra Hint Line at $3/min*