You are not contributing anything with this autistic diversion about semantics

And you are autistically devoted to fungi :P

they actually *add* energy to the system

Which are of much less help than plants are

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00345532

Nigga, read this

read this before you say this retarded noncense again

Phosphates can be spiked

Just like any other mineral

Plants need other bacteria to convert Phosphorus and fix Nitrogen for them

Ver few plants can do it themselves

Ecosystems are everywhere

Ok should I change sentence?

Plants don't need multicellulars

To help

And breeding bacteria are found in every piece of soil

There are very very very few self-sustained organisms out there

The problem with fungi is that

Our either going to have to constantly be spiking their soil with organic matter

There is no problem with fungi

Expect sunlight

You just made that shit up because you don'tlike fungi

Or they'll die

So you'll constantly have to be transporting

Organic matter

*to* the space station

>> you grow plants
>> you grow fungi

Ecosystem

If you want fungi to be producing animal proteins

You're gonna need dead animals too

Why you insist on being so scientifically illiterate just to counter my argument with some of the most tarded bullshit?

Space elevators can help reduce this issue

Stobbit before you embarrass yourself even more

Uksio your argument was that it's more efficient to put fungi into space than animals

I'm just saying that argument is silly

Yes - it GROWS

Nigga keyword GROWS

Animals grow too

😉

It needs Organic matter consistantly to grow is what he means

You transport a fixed amount of stuff to kisckstart a self-sustained ecosystem ONE TIME