god is in all things man can perceive

@Scale_e i am describing god as concept, and not as a graven image from man's mind

anthropromorphic principle

exactly

I am aware of the way the Hindu sees the world being built, and how some view themselves as part of a dramatic simulation played by the Godhead within each of them.

my favorite expression about god is : (one sec)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DF-21

@nim.bm

:"If I take a lamp and shine it toward the wall, a bright spot will appear on the wall. The lamp is our search for truth, for understanding. Too often, we assume that the light on the wall is God, but the light is not the goal of the search, it is the result of the search. The more intense the search, the brighter the light on the wall. The brighter the light on the wall, the greater the sense of revelation upon seeing it. Similarly, someone who does not search - who does not bring a lantern - sees nothing. What we perceive as God is the by-product of our search for God. It may simply be an appreciation of the light... pure and unblemished... not understanding that it comes from us. Sometimes we stand in front of the light and assume that we are the center of the universe - God looks astonishingly like we do - or we turn to look at our shadow and assume that all is darkness. If we allow ourselves to get in the way, we defeat the purpose, which is to use the light of our search to illuminate the wall in all its beauty and in all its flaws; and in so doing, better understand the world around us."

sorry for length

There is no way to define metaphysics brandished in perfection and arguable degrees of strength/potential, with lack of permeable weakness/limitation.

well, that is a 'proto-argument'

Humans are limited in their perception. You cannot be completely aware of vast environments, and since the concept of God is spread everywhere, it representing perfection, then you cannot be completely aware of this concept.

The Universe's laws have yet to start decaying.

Gravity will continue to pull objects of high mass that bend the fabric of space-time until the foreseeable future.

That is a perfect Universe, as far as we could tell.

exactly; which is why my first axiom of metaphysics is "Anything that exist must influence at least one OTHER thing that exists"

It always takes two, that one.

and '3' is required for an identity

1 contrast pair; 1 comparison pair

Are the holes of the net that make a net useful, or is it the strings?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMBLGOQEJQo she did it bois <:poggers:583775485620781087>

comes down to the definition of a 'net'

tulsi is in with her sweet bod <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

"If you find a contraditction, check your premises. You will find one in error"

It is both the holes and the strings that make the net useful.

Dude, Tulsi gabbard is waifu ❤

To carry on with your analogy.

@Laucivol break it down even further to blocks of atoms, and their fundamental particles

what is a hole without the medium which forms it's boundary?

Trump can fuck off now, we got a hot girl to rule the country <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

What it captures, and what it permits past are both relevant.

that is a filter

not a net

The hole itself cannot be empty either, for gas passes through it while within the observable limits of a space objects akin to our planet

or a screen