Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 626577587639943168
There is no AI. No system, nothing, that can calculate that.
It happens organically. Via market forces.
This is why socialism always fails.
in theory, yes. but modern trading bots can ALREADY create market changes that look like authentic trends
supply and demand haven't been the primary input variables for quite some time
Socialism is just laziness
a market manipulated by an elite few for their benefit shows little difference to a top-down economy
The question was the practical one. And the cost of production *should* play into the hamfisted answer provided.
what about services?
So, no, not outright negation if you'd rather discuss it.
or IP?
As said, cost of production is the first question for valuation.
but a service doesn't nessecary have any cost of production
Eh, secondary costs of manpower maintenance and so on play.
i am of the traditional school of thought that only PRODUCTION represents true economic value
Eh, service is valuable as well.
services simply enable producers to spend more time producing
but they provide no lasting value
And manpower costs count as material in context.
Eh, providing that time is of lasting value.
if i create a knife, that knife is useful even if it is stored in an attic yrs later and then bought at a yard sale
but a service is an expendable
if money gets tight, everyone starts doing their own services
but production always retains value
Eh, what of training, then?
training is overhead
There is that adage about teaching a man to fish versus providing a fish.
a simple cost of doing business
yup
the key to note is what the source of 'value'' is
It is a cost of it, but undermining the instructors' service is part of what got us into this predicament.
market value isn't intrinsic value nor cost
*shrugs* We're not gonna reach eye to eye on this one.
we are
Service has value, as does material. Your position does not agree with this.
i never said there was NO value
I said that value didn't have the same WEIGHT as production
services like business 'oil the machinery' of production and trade
but they aren't ESSENTIALS
"i am of the traditional school of thought that only PRODUCTION represents true economic value" If you're walking back this point, very well.
rememeber that any production also implies a degree of creative destruction which has costs of their own