Message from @Laucivol

Discord ID: 626578275807789088


2019-09-26 00:32:57 UTC  

As said, cost of production is the first question for valuation.

2019-09-26 00:33:16 UTC  

but a service doesn't nessecary have any cost of production

2019-09-26 00:33:44 UTC  

Eh, secondary costs of manpower maintenance and so on play.

2019-09-26 00:34:30 UTC  

i am of the traditional school of thought that only PRODUCTION represents true economic value

2019-09-26 00:34:50 UTC  

Eh, service is valuable as well.

2019-09-26 00:34:54 UTC  

services simply enable producers to spend more time producing

2019-09-26 00:35:08 UTC  

but they provide no lasting value

2019-09-26 00:35:09 UTC  

And manpower costs count as material in context.

2019-09-26 00:35:26 UTC  

Eh, providing that time is of lasting value.

2019-09-26 00:35:38 UTC  

if i create a knife, that knife is useful even if it is stored in an attic yrs later and then bought at a yard sale

2019-09-26 00:35:47 UTC  

but a service is an expendable

2019-09-26 00:36:39 UTC  

if money gets tight, everyone starts doing their own services

2019-09-26 00:36:47 UTC  

but production always retains value

2019-09-26 00:37:01 UTC  

Eh, what of training, then?

2019-09-26 00:37:16 UTC  

training is overhead

2019-09-26 00:37:29 UTC  

There is that adage about teaching a man to fish versus providing a fish.

2019-09-26 00:37:30 UTC  

a simple cost of doing business

2019-09-26 00:37:47 UTC  

yup

2019-09-26 00:38:08 UTC  

the key to note is what the source of 'value'' is

2019-09-26 00:38:22 UTC  

It is a cost of it, but undermining the instructors' service is part of what got us into this predicament.

2019-09-26 00:38:26 UTC  

market value isn't intrinsic value nor cost

2019-09-26 00:38:40 UTC  

*shrugs* We're not gonna reach eye to eye on this one.

2019-09-26 00:38:54 UTC  

we are

2019-09-26 00:39:05 UTC  

Service has value, as does material. Your position does not agree with this.

2019-09-26 00:39:22 UTC  

i never said there was NO value

2019-09-26 00:39:33 UTC  

I said that value didn't have the same WEIGHT as production

2019-09-26 00:39:55 UTC  

services like business 'oil the machinery' of production and trade

2019-09-26 00:40:02 UTC  

but they aren't ESSENTIALS

2019-09-26 00:40:16 UTC  

"i am of the traditional school of thought that only PRODUCTION represents true economic value" If you're walking back this point, very well.

2019-09-26 00:40:37 UTC  

rememeber that any production also implies a degree of creative destruction which has costs of their own

2019-09-26 00:41:00 UTC  

"represents true economic value" key word true

2019-09-26 00:41:08 UTC  

not the same word as 'only'

2019-09-26 00:41:33 UTC  

Also, you indicated they are essential as the shift to tight income is to in house. Nonessential would me the service is discontinued.

2019-09-26 00:41:45 UTC  

i.e. measuring the quantity of production gives you a direct metric of economic performance

2019-09-26 00:41:58 UTC  

but measuring services gives an indirect measure

2019-09-26 00:42:14 UTC  

if i have a nuclear meltdown, all types of new services are required

2019-09-26 00:42:18 UTC  

Erm, that word "true" speaks of singular relevance- all other matters are "false."

2019-09-26 00:42:21 UTC  

but is this a net POSITIVE?

2019-09-26 00:42:42 UTC  

True is another very strong word.