Message from @You are tearing me apart lisa

Discord ID: 626800646527647755


2019-09-26 15:17:46 UTC  

Or the graviton wouldn't be detectible in spacetime because photon is the spacetime effect of electromagnetism or summet

2019-09-26 15:17:58 UTC  

Hmmm

2019-09-26 15:18:08 UTC  

Yeah

2019-09-26 15:18:22 UTC  

Is spacetime the sum of all fields or a separate field

2019-09-26 15:18:26 UTC  

ie. we assume gravity is uniform but we have no way of confirming this

2019-09-26 15:18:51 UTC  

Given I'm no scientist I'm open to answers here haha

2019-09-26 15:19:38 UTC  

what was the question?

2019-09-26 15:19:51 UTC  

yup. certainly. i also think there is an occupational hazard of scientists to forget that reality is their ultimate criteria; not their models or math

2019-09-26 15:19:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613767975614283832/626800113599119380/Screenshot_2019-09-25-18-54-352.png

2019-09-26 15:20:01 UTC  

When the server starts talking about quantum physics

2019-09-26 15:20:07 UTC  

And you can't chemistry

2019-09-26 15:20:20 UTC  

Negros

2019-09-26 15:20:32 UTC  

lol; most people that can do physics aren't chemists

2019-09-26 15:20:33 UTC  

Chemistry is glorified electricity :p

2019-09-26 15:20:46 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613767975614283832/626800329039544330/FB_IMG_1568648437231.jpg

2019-09-26 15:21:03 UTC  

Kek

2019-09-26 15:21:19 UTC  

point is that general relativity doesn't mesh with quantum theory

2019-09-26 15:21:20 UTC  

It would be safe to assume we are a digital recreation of an analog world.

2019-09-26 15:21:40 UTC  

they are good enough in their own right but not 'complete'

2019-09-26 15:21:41 UTC  

I'd say it's safe to assume we are not living

2019-09-26 15:21:59 UTC  

Because we are made of non living protons neutrons and electrons

2019-09-26 15:22:08 UTC  

that was the point of the video i posted; the best assumption is NO assumption

2019-09-26 15:23:03 UTC  

if one can't observe or measure something, it cannot be treated with the same weight as assertions we can prove USING conclusions drawn from actual measurement

2019-09-26 15:24:55 UTC  

every expression in general realitivity includes an assumed '+C' ; a degree of uncertainty meaning that the more removed we become from the actual measurement, the more that uncertainty is compounded

2019-09-26 15:25:51 UTC  

this becomes a problem at the exterma of the theory

2019-09-26 15:26:15 UTC  

@You are tearing me apart lisa we are all star stuff

2019-09-26 15:28:14 UTC  

Anyone ever hear of the proposed electro-static model of the universe

2019-09-26 15:29:26 UTC  

or consider that while the universe might be expanding and we might be peering back in time at stars that died long ago, the photons we see are only a few hours old?

2019-09-26 15:29:33 UTC  

relativity

2019-09-26 15:30:22 UTC  

We inhabit the space that was once held by our ancestors.

2019-09-26 15:30:45 UTC  

With IT comes some overheads.

2019-09-26 15:30:55 UTC  

true enough

2019-09-26 15:32:01 UTC  

maybe time just doesn't exist. it is just a reference frame between two static universes

2019-09-26 15:32:13 UTC  

Remove every star. We don't need em, they need us. Rise up!

2019-09-26 15:33:00 UTC  

The issue is, we can do maths

2019-09-26 15:33:12 UTC  

We can show dozens of models that look like they work

2019-09-26 15:33:19 UTC  

but we don't have ALL the info

2019-09-26 15:33:26 UTC  

the issue is, math isn't reality; it's just a model of it

2019-09-26 15:33:50 UTC  

so the missing pieces of that puzzle can't be filled in

2019-09-26 15:33:55 UTC  

and you can't say

2019-09-26 15:34:02 UTC  

"well this model won't work"