Message from @Cryosite

Discord ID: 628102711753048074


2019-09-30 05:32:55 UTC  

Fuck that whore.

2019-09-30 05:32:55 UTC  

Pelosi is horrible and now she's pushing for impeachment so I have no sympathy for her whatsoever

2019-09-30 05:33:05 UTC  

@Goodwood of Dank™ and that's her mistake to make. I didn't say she was particularly bright

2019-09-30 05:33:08 UTC  

@UnfilteredGarbage So there's no special distinctions among the Reps.

2019-09-30 05:33:45 UTC  

@Goodwood of Dank™ or they could just act according to principle while also letting people wear hats

2019-09-30 05:33:45 UTC  

Pelosi will probably retire

2019-09-30 05:33:57 UTC  

Pelosi is 79 years old

2019-09-30 05:34:06 UTC  

Older than Trump? Danm.

2019-09-30 05:34:12 UTC  

She must dye the fuck out of her hair.

2019-09-30 05:34:19 UTC  

Like I can respect their being a basic dress code for the sake of professionalism but the hats thing is just meaningless 20th century garbage

2019-09-30 05:34:26 UTC  

They call her crypt keeper for a reason

2019-09-30 05:34:34 UTC  

But the religious hats inform the elected servants of what tribe the others are, and thus encourage religious infighting.

2019-09-30 05:34:36 UTC  

Dude, the hats thing has been around for centuries.

2019-09-30 05:34:46 UTC  

And it's been meaningless for centuries

2019-09-30 05:34:52 UTC  

Old things aren't inherently good

2019-09-30 05:35:04 UTC  

The hats being old things, and not good. Agreed.

2019-09-30 05:35:15 UTC  

I don't know if you're doing it deliberately, but you're misunderstanding what the rule is supposed to be about.

2019-09-30 05:35:40 UTC  

The rule is about a situation that could be avoided if everyone just acted as they're expected to act anyways. So it's redundant

2019-09-30 05:35:51 UTC  

I don't really care if she wears a hijab

2019-09-30 05:35:55 UTC  

You don't need to take peoples' hats away to stop prejudicial treatment

2019-09-30 05:35:56 UTC  

Well, we see hats in, and we see people not acting as they should.

2019-09-30 05:36:12 UTC  

Hijabs aren't hats

2019-09-30 05:36:18 UTC  

Also, if you don't think hats matter, you never played TF2.

2019-09-30 05:36:28 UTC  

The reason they overturned it wasn't valid. It was only so one of their biggest memes would take her seat.

2019-09-30 05:36:35 UTC  

At least, it wasn't a good reason.

2019-09-30 05:36:43 UTC  

Wearing the ghastly gibus in congress

2019-09-30 05:36:52 UTC  

@Goodwood of Dank™ you don't need valid reasoning to overturn a standard that isn't valid to begin with

2019-09-30 05:37:00 UTC  

Ree.

2019-09-30 05:37:01 UTC  

It was valid to begin with.

2019-09-30 05:37:07 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-09-30 05:37:23 UTC  

The house rules aren't followed that well anyways

2019-09-30 05:37:45 UTC  

Agree to disagree as grown-ups from opposing clans, honoring the push and pull - I shoulda called the Scolomance. Oh well.

2019-09-30 05:37:55 UTC  

Yeah. Like, you're not allowed to call other elected official racist. Oh, oops...

2019-09-30 05:38:41 UTC  

Imagine actually giving a shit about CSPAN drama though

2019-09-30 05:38:48 UTC  

"Point of personal privilege" Is not a call to order or parliamentary inquiry ffs

2019-09-30 05:39:17 UTC  

Don't tell me they're doing that in the actual House now? I thought that shit was the highschool Dems club shit?

2019-09-30 05:39:23 UTC  

Yes

2019-09-30 05:39:49 UTC  

I've heard it several times this year and it's cringey as fuck.

2019-09-30 05:40:21 UTC  

I heard it at the DSA "convention," but not in the actual House.

2019-09-30 05:40:25 UTC  

I need to see the sauce.

2019-09-30 05:40:49 UTC  

Ping me tomorrow and I'll link it