Message from @Cryosite
Discord ID: 628102368029966336
I don't feel sorry for them one bit
They have to endure that shrill, nails on chalkboard voice that Omar has. And they have to pretend to listen to her like good tolerant lefties.
Its not gymnastics if you can literally do anything to win against infidels
@UnfilteredGarbage The rule is supposed to ensure that all members were equal under the law. No silly religious hats or skullcaps, etc.
Zionists not welcome
@Cryosite nancy pelosi doesn't even pretend to listen to them.
I'm starting to feel that 'enemy of my enemy is my friend' shit with pelosi though, I can at least respect her for not cowtowing to the vocal far-left minority
@Goodwood of Dank™ how would wearing a hat make them unequal under the law
She still wants to impeach, though—at the risk of losing everything.
I live in California. I have zero tolerance for Pelosi.
Fuck that whore.
Pelosi is horrible and now she's pushing for impeachment so I have no sympathy for her whatsoever
@Goodwood of Dank™ and that's her mistake to make. I didn't say she was particularly bright
@UnfilteredGarbage So there's no special distinctions among the Reps.
@Goodwood of Dank™ or they could just act according to principle while also letting people wear hats
Pelosi will probably retire
Pelosi is 79 years old
Older than Trump? Danm.
She must dye the fuck out of her hair.
Like I can respect their being a basic dress code for the sake of professionalism but the hats thing is just meaningless 20th century garbage
They call her crypt keeper for a reason
But the religious hats inform the elected servants of what tribe the others are, and thus encourage religious infighting.
Dude, the hats thing has been around for centuries.
And it's been meaningless for centuries
Old things aren't inherently good
The hats being old things, and not good. Agreed.
I don't know if you're doing it deliberately, but you're misunderstanding what the rule is supposed to be about.
The rule is about a situation that could be avoided if everyone just acted as they're expected to act anyways. So it's redundant
I don't really care if she wears a hijab
You don't need to take peoples' hats away to stop prejudicial treatment
Well, we see hats in, and we see people not acting as they should.
Hijabs aren't hats
Also, if you don't think hats matter, you never played TF2.
The reason they overturned it wasn't valid. It was only so one of their biggest memes would take her seat.
At least, it wasn't a good reason.
Wearing the ghastly gibus in congress
@Goodwood of Dank™ you don't need valid reasoning to overturn a standard that isn't valid to begin with
Ree.
It was valid to begin with.
Indeed.
The house rules aren't followed that well anyways
Agree to disagree as grown-ups from opposing clans, honoring the push and pull - I shoulda called the Scolomance. Oh well.