Message from @Ironclad
Discord ID: 625925276496429056
Aye people of all ages and sizes, I present to you a message sent to all available Greta Thunberg contact points, I would like to submit this for public review.
I'll say this right off the bat; Yeah, I'd like to be nice to the climate. But please, do indulge, critize this "response". I'd like to "perfect" it.
*Hi, respectfully; when are you or your piers going to provide som actually realistic goals?
I get it, your heart burns for the climate. But the current trajectory you're on speaks of terrible emotional control. (I have a good dosage of autism myself, I don't claim to know what it's like for you, but I have a general understanding)
The problem isn't inherently that you're talking about the climate; I'm with you on that one, I want to make the world better as well. But this PR trail you're on is just causing problems for those of us trying to bring realistic suggestions to the forefront.
It is problematic because it blocks real debate and you've effectively created a cult mentality and have thus removed the option for me to have a proper discussion with other people. People end up sharing your stuff for brownie points and just for the headlines.
I try to recommend people to read scientific papers instead of reading articles. Because both sides can be wrong (and are, in many cases) You've been wrong several times, but so has the climate deniers.
All in all, I would suggest you stop telling people how to think or process the climate situation - encourage them to find out for themselves.*
i smell autism
I smell a weeb
*>why not both* <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
Hello, respectfully; when are you or your peers going to provide some actually realistic goals?
I get it, your heart burns for the climate. But the current trajectory you're on speaks of terrible emotional control. (I have a good dosage of autism myself, I don't claim to know what it's like for you, but I have a general understanding)
The problem isn't inherently that you're talking about the climate; I'm with you on that one, I want to make the world better as well. But this PR trail you're on is just causing problems for those of us trying to bring realistic suggestions to the forefront.
It is problematic because it blocks real debate and you've effectively created a cult mentality and have thus removed the option for me to have a proper discussion with other people. People end up sharing your stuff for brownie points and just for the headlines.
I try to recommend people to read scientific papers instead of reading articles. Because both sides can be wrong (and are, in many cases) You've been wrong several times, but so have the climate deniers.
All in all, I would suggest you stop telling people how to think or process the climate situation - encourage them to find out for themselves.
Edited for spelling, also mocked up her response for you
Greta: **REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE**<:angrypepe:497157904743268363>
So i have a thought,who would win in a hypothetical war between the U.S and Israel?
Without nukes
It would never happen goyim
US, even without nukes. We have a better equipped army, still larger than Israel's even without compulsory service. While every Israeli man can potentially be counted among their armed forces. They are also surrounded by enemies that would no doubt take advantage of the situation, while the US is surrounded by allies that at worst would not intervene
i just came here to praise our lord and savior jupiter optimus maximus not talk about politics
Hæ
Welcome to my city state
Liar.
yokuso, watashi wa no soul society
so how long will i be stuck at the walls of an open city
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Said the nomads surrounding Ulaanbaatar 20 years ago
Some people have done the math and they figure the entire world can't really take on the US, if no one uses nukes.
A big part of it being these three giant things called the US Navy, the Atlantic, and the Pacific.
Also the fact that the US has nearly every land type except rainforests and has nearly every resource they could ever really need. There's a few exceptions, but those would be simple enough to secure.
The US does basically decide who gets nukes or not, we decide when a country is ready to come play at the big kids table. Sometimes we were wrong
Also, we do have rainforests
PNW
Olympic national rainforest
The entire Washington peninsula
Yeah, but they don't get quite as hot as the ones that tend to be considered important.
Which is an important thing.
There's a youtube video about the whole 'US vs the world' thing.
Louisiana swamps, just as wet, hot and humid as the Amazon. Just less rain.
Meh, it's not much of an issue. Not a lot of places with supplies worth taking that also exist within a rain forest.
That we know of, second most unexplored regions on Earth next to the ocean
If anyone cared, they'd explore and survey them.
Possibly
But even this last attempt at freaking out about the Amazon rainforest being on fire was a disingenuous attempt at a power grab.
Just like this environmental idiocy that happened today.
Well, yesterday at this point.
dottys arrogance knows no bounds it seems
Dottys?