it wasnt feminist it was focused on survival

not the past

and u need women for survival

or they needed

@Tato i mean you can see how it is in islamic countries to this day with men being complete slaves to women

There's a lot no one here is taking into account which is technology

These solutions might work as the world is but

muslims are slaves of ideology both men and women

If you fuck off to some backwater area, never advertise, never put up signs, and take pride in not being friendly towards outsiders, then nobody is ever going to want to go there. Just make sure you steadily build more and more gated communities, so you'll end up with this iron wall of "Don't come here" staring people in the face.

Not that long ago there where people who lived before the advent of the plane

And technological growth is increasing at least as far as I can tell

Hence why you don't want to become Amish 2.0.

You want to keep up with modern technology. Just not the culture.

@Arthur Grayborn long before you gain enough resources to build a wall you'd be infiltrated

simply do to your size

> moms

@Tato and who, may i ask, forms the ideology of children? Who has time to raise them with men being required to provide for their female relatives and - if they are marrying cause theres a huge amount of incels there thanks to polygamy empowering women to go all for the very best of men - who has time for that?

@Muten - Not if your entire society is built around gated communities, where one of the existing residents has to sponsor you.

We need to move away from polygamy in the very least

Ever heard of the fox and the hound?

@Redneo women form ideology of children men form ideology of women

Pair bonding is the way to go

>women form ideology of children men form ideology of women
do you even human

people from the inside would get interested with people from the outside and let them in

Polygamy COULD work, in theory, if you could manipulate the relative birth rates of men and women. You don't want to end up with a bunch of partner-less men though, not unless you're willing to embrace turning a bunch of men into traps.

I hate both protect the childran and protect the womenz

@Tato no. women form ideologies of men, too. men want to please women and do what they want. allways did, allways will.

polygamy works in practice\

I mean just look at ancient societies

very successful with rampant polygamy

@Arthur Grayborn sounds good to me.

besides if women shape childrens ideology, those children grow up to be the men later on 😛

Its less about birth-rates and more about the social strength and stability of 2 person relationships ie pair bonding

false its a modern idea and it is so in modernity thats y west is falling apart socially

my hair is a bird

We actually already have the tech for creating more female babies, where you do some medical sort of thing pre-selecting the sperm.

@Arthur Grayborn not having women anymore. we have created eggcells from blood, we dont need women for eggcells. and we have biobags, we dont need their wombs...

In poly you can't have people as tightly knit

Which sounds bad but we're talking about family so

in past women tried to make men like them they wanted to be desireable

modern men are feminine