Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 599276047531245578
yes they would dare
What about his family? If tommy gets cut, will they get asylum?
well thats fucked then
If the State is able to get away with allowing Tommy to be off'd, there is no limit to what they will try
so i wouldn't count on it
Why would his family receive asylum
anyone at a bonfire last night? my local one they were burning pretty much only the poster of newly elected MEP Naomi Long whom wants to stop brexit, personally I object to burning of imagery of people though but it's common across the land on the 11th evening.
Realize that Aydin in her video is unwittingly making a scientific argument for why one should be a narcissist and projecting THIS standard onto others. Cognitive Behavioural Theory (CBT) gave rise to the weaponization of social ridicule by entitled, childish brats to the point that ALL guilt, not just that which is the function of manipulation is externalized onto others. Aydin's video is an extension of this rationalization. THIS is what enabled crybullies to become immune to social ridicule while STILL using said ridicule to manipulate others.
Cognitive Behavioural Theory
from wikipedia
the free encyclopedia
is the queen of england an islamic whore?
Cognitive Behavioural Theory (CBT)
is a sexual activity
oh wait
wrong CBT
but their is a theory behind it's application which is valid
It's Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
used to treat rape victims and such with 'surviour's guilt'
@Diffused Solvent shes the old lady that watches everything burn while getting ready for teavtime
but such ideas have be preverted to allow Crybullies to wield social ridicule against Conservatives but not be effected by it themselves
<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>
This can only lead to a form of totalitarianism
Ah
Fuck
MA you're talking out your ass
Uno reverse
@JewishBastard oy vey
What
oy vey
Synopsis: "Realize that societies have two mechanisms for encouraging behaviour that they deem 'appropriate' while punishing behaviour that is not. These mechanisms are; LAW (explicit) and SOCIAL RIDICULE (implicit). Society can be viewed as two concentric spheres the internal sphere being the function of what the 'community' deems appropriate and the outer sphere a function of what is passed into law by the State. LAW should be formed by precendence and the COMMUNITY (that inner sphere) should SET that precendence. 98% of the time, the State isn't required and people's behaviour is shaped by social norms using guilt/shame. The State doesn't VIOLATE the inner sphere. Teaching people to not apologize destroys the ability for ANY social ridicule to have an effect. While this might be advantageous to defeat those that currently wield this influence inappropriately at present, (Feminists, Race-Baiters, Manipulators etc.) it will inevitably destroy the power of ANYONE to utilize social ridicule constructively. (Parents/Elders shaping standards for children: See Mouse Utopia where children don't learn to prioritize the needs of the young over their own impulses and children become pawns in the struggle for dominance). "
" Such a policy will inevitably leave the ONLY mechanism of regulating behaviour to the STATE. The State begins to encroach on people's lives more and more attempting to 'legislate morality'. Inevitably, this leads to a form of TOTALITARIANISM. (I.e. State is ONLY authority) Can you not see that THIS is why Communist ideas (i.e. mama's totalitarianism) held by those who are OVERLY emotional are always countered/followed by FASCIST ideas (i.e. papa's totalitarianism) which LACK ALL EMOTION? Apathy is the ultimate form of insulation against social ridicule but is ALSO a more powerful tool in dehumanizing groups of individuals. Hatred is nothing compared to apathy however for those who ONLY can fathom a world of emotion, apathy is mistaken for hatred. Oh BTW, emotions are NOT 'negative or positive'. (Counsoler Troi was RIGHT!) Only what people CHOOSE to DO in RESPONSE to an emotion is 'negative or positive'! " "
CBT?