yes yes

Its true that hunters are way stronger then peasents mentally too because of the of meat

a feature for your nobility to not be able to read

peasants keep animals tho

domesticated ones

it's called livestock

writing systems weren't bad, just rudimentary

I remember they said hunter gatherers tended to be autistic.

it pictograms to represent things

yes

thats called being bad

its almost impossible to learn

and very hard to adapt

There was meat for the tradesmen and better off people I don't think the actual peasants go it though

it wasnt until the phoenicians that a not shit alphabet was mad

i think autism actually helps hunter gatherers lol

made

phonetic alphabet

being obsessed with making traps or fishing or building simple huts

literally

or knowing what is poison

peasants keep animal

peasants eat animal

So, I got an idea from sargon... Imma go to my local highschool/college and ask peeps to sign a petition. "End women's suffrage! They've suffered enough!"

you dont have nobles claiming every single animal

dont be retarded

also hunter gatherers aren't as social, since less population

even when peasants didnt neven own land

in the middle ages

they ate meat

I'm not a historical expert so I'm just going to take your word on this one

yeah the farming classes were able to domesticate animals over time

so their lives improved

And if I get a lot of sigs, I'll present it to the schoolboard and ask them to change the system.

but initially, farming was monocrop

throughouit the neolithic, they didn't use animals for ploughing

they did it by hand

they basically just ate bread and that's it

also, in middle ages meat was expensive, so not eaten all the time

they only slaughtered animals like once a year

and meat was hard to preserve