Message from @Coolitic
Discord ID: 600722245609848876
i mean unless we're to be so silly as to suggest that all of the differences between blacks and other groups stem entirely from environmental factors
So @Arthur Grayborn is technically rigjt
@Polekov - I'm pretty sure the view is that all humans were violent savages back then, but evolution did not stop the moment humans ventured out of Africa.
no, im saying what death in june is saying
"Silly"
I mean whose the racist now
@Arthur Grayborn humans are violent savages everywhere we go
And so natural selection forced them to mate with those who have genetically predisposed themselves to more violent tendencies for survival.
Meanwhile
yes
but how is that unique to africa
Tho I consider the *possibility*
i mean
everything is statues/historical paintings, anime, memes, or some videogame character generic tough guy
Most other continents weren't as dangerous or violent.
You have literally 0 proof to back urself up
again, this is not true
This is true.
bro, during the ice ages, there were saber tooth tigres and cave lions
in europe
the average iq in the poorest chinese province, a province that has a lower gdp per capita than fvcking zimbabwe is 104, more than a standard deviation higher than the average iq of african americans
and even after the ice ages
I'm not talking about the ice ages.
if anything, europe was far more dangerous than africa
Correlation != causation
but humans migrated out of africa during the ice ages
No, they didn't.
yes they did
Europe has this thing called winter. You need to plan for it. Cooperate with other farmers. Coordinate defense. It forces people to be less violent and more introspective.
Africa has lions and other large predators. It's a violent place by default.
No, they really didn't.
@Death in June thats because the chinese at least value education
lol fck your loud music https://twitter.com/CarlForrest/status/1150856399158730752?s=20
They migrated out of Africa before the ice ages and evolved away from one another.
the last ice age was 11,000 years ago
not necessarily but the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of there being clear iq differences between different groups stemming from their different gene pools
Again
Literally
Not slightly
Correlation is not causation