🤷

I mean

yeah but i mean that would just mean that there would be a 6 year period where they lack data

@MaikuPens flight conditions

They were too busy building Nazi rockets

They might have

Lacking data is bad data collection change my mind.

Weather would be important for that

Nah nah nah they did weather

Not much flying in Europe.

They constantly postponed missions due to fog

i mean they can lack that data and still have data for a much larger amount of years

>not much flying in world war two

Are you retarded

Silence, brand

What was the blitzkreig

There really wasn't much flying, comparatively.

I wonder why they stop at 1950 and don't go back to, say, 1934?

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

Compared to?

🤔

Maybe it's because the average temperature in 1934 was higher than it is today.

Yep

Still not a ducking good thing

Honestly we humans feel like we’re so smart and have control

To have it this high

Still not an accurate display of global temperature.

But yeah also

Which isn't even true.

We don’t have control over smack diddly

Show me your research then

that chart isn't a measurement of temperature

If you think you’re smarter than nasa

NASA is a shill mate

feedback loops. The main one being that carbon emissions raise temperatures a smol bit, then the resulting increase in water vapour amplifies the temperature increase

They get given money to say that

You trust Sargon on climate change more than the scientific community?

Secondary one being that as temperatures increase, permafrost melts and decomposes, releasing more carbon into the atmosphere