Silly argument about the centralisation

Because you reduce end point emissions

Then if you improve the generation of the electricity itself

Then the whole process is a lot cleaner

'then'? you mean than?

which one 😛

haha

I mean then as in then the next stage

yes

ok

my underslept brain kinda struggles with this? reducing end point emissions doesnt increase centralisation? is that your point?

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/276499611903066122/601230662187352064/tmxwRfA.png

i mean you couldve said the fuel delivery is already fully centralised lol

but yeah

dunnae

🤷

My point is that yes, if the electric generated to power electric cars is generated from unclean sources such as gas or coal or whatever then yea electric cars are pointless. BUT, as electricity is generated via cleaner methods then the end point of emissions in the process (the car itself) will be a net positive as electricity in itself doesn’t produce emissions, but petrol/diesel does

you dont need to clean your nails if you have none <:thinkgon:560211224923734026>

ah yeah so we're going nuclear as already established : )

Yea nuclear would be better than what we have now

I’d rather we use more tidal and hydro power though

especially in the UK like wtf

probably filling up your shore with electricity generating turbines makes it you know

filled up

with shit

also imagine having a substantial portion of power generated on offshore farms

Not quite, actually

one russian submarine is going to cripple your entire country ; )

Even if you burn the same fuel

DO IT

If you have a massive building to do it in

But at the moment we are using Russian gas anyway

And very expensive, heavy, highly efficient equipment because it doesn't need to be in a car

They could just cut it off

Ye that too

well yeah you buy their gas so they leave you alone

get independent and they wont

Maybe we should stop demonising Russia lol

Russia can’t do shit lmao

They are a paper tiger

not demonising, realisticalising lol