Don't shoot the messenger . I just read the shit and then I am like ... Okay. Fine.

@Eccles jizzing pollution! Hahahaha

i mean energy independence would be great and dangerous at the same time

@StAbby are you an environigger?

China spunks cancer everywhere

No i just cant answer that without giving the common answer that CFCs were destroying the ozone. I am asking if theres an answer that wouldnt involve that common asnwer, since that answer involved climate change

Their carbon footprint alone makes cows dung look like a wet fart

wat

Im inquiring

cfc has naught to do with climate change

Decat your diesels, folks, time to go roll coal in front of Greenpeace HQ

it was a worry that everybody will be getting cancer at the age of 12 that was driving that change

No one cares ... It's money. They want you to buy new products and they want you to lay off the oil, cos they don't want to buy it anymore.

The common answer with climate change is the zoomed out view to any market problem

And have a BBQ in front of PETA HQ

Nobody is arguing over the zoomed out view

at least where and when i was growing up

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/YsMuISXrZpi-CpD7XnKo10rwcHwxcX8sW3To5E4CaDU/https/i.redd.it/x0vwopeax2b31.jpg

According to the bank of England @Eccles there is cash to be had from it.

Ok, the answer is that CFCs didnt do anything but cause cancer?

Bank of England wants burning down and renationalising

Climate change is good because it means warm weather, which means more time to drink beer

No, StAbby

no they react with ozone to form other compounds not as good at reflecting UV light

And there was cynical me, sat there looking at their four year projection , thinking everyone knew.

CFCs story has no equivlence to climate change

in both cases theres science of it and politics/business of it 🤷

Hop off the bus a minute because, the bank of England thinks you as consumers have the money to do this technological change.

not really, svaroz

hey how do you get an invite link to this server?

Presumably from Soygon's channel

CFCs did not have a producer/consumer equation

CLimate change does

@svarozhyc this was the money forum thing in Davos with all the NGO'S. I read about that too and I swear to feck.... I wasn't impressed because how the heck is anyone going to make money if, people are going to be replaced with robots?

China are making 90 million robots.

CFCs had a direct replacement, so tackling the problem was trivial from a behavioural and legislative point of view

You pay me 20 @TailsFromTheIntellectualDarkWeb

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/2185993/man-vs-machine-chinas-workforce-starting-feel-strain-threat#ampshare=https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/2185993/man-vs-machine-chinas-workforce-starting-feel-strain-threat

can i do an iou?

lol

You got 2 billion people in your country and you want to replace your workforce with robots!!!! WTF??