If you actually want to learn more about politics and not just be stuck in this loop of “destroy libtards -> be obsessed” then you should read

Vs being an intentional shitlord.

It doesn’t have to be much

Just 5 pages a day is more than most

I don't do that tho

I talk to people who have read

@ratboygeinus Ω i shall read once the libtards have been destroyed

5 pages? How about 10 sentences 😄

and I let them explain shit to me

and I decide whether or not I agree

and try to explain why

with FACTS and LOGIC

yes

with facts and logic

kek

Then you are getting actual smart ideas filtered though people’s own biases

I can't do Pewdiepie in a sitting, but the bit I've seen.. I prefer the bumbling into the line.

hey to each their own 😃

@ratboygeinus Ω If they have a bias and still can't make an idea sound good I think it's a bad idea

EXCEPT RELIGION CUZ REEEEEEEEE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakub_(Nation_of_Islam)

@Muten do you believe in utilitarianism?

religionofpeace.com

No

I think it's a good tool

Actually can talk with kids about Pewdiepie .. (I'm a Sunday school teacher).

https://thereligionofpeace.com/

I think

it's a lens

right?

My mum literally did this when I said I wanted to read Mein Kampf so I can understand extremism better, the first thing she did was look up a psychologist who had analyzed and dissected the book so I could read that instead. I almost went like "bitch what?" 😄

Okay let’s assume you do. Then one source may explain it well and another badly based on how they interpret it. You don’t actually engage with the whole ideas in themselves. You just get fragments

No

Utilitarianism is, very roughly, the idea that the ends of a moral system justify the means

ETBROOD was like MGTOW bitch gimme that book

Ok yeah

Nah, gotta read the source to prevent radicalization.

I can understand that

I can skim pretty well

But trying to read just gets me confused

So is killing 10 people okay to save your wife?