not that early

Locke is for big brains

all things said

and pretty damn """""authoritarian""""" for later Liberals

i mean

holy shit lol

you want a good example of effective authoritarianism?

Big brains but little real world applicabilty

fucking uh

Oliver Cromwell

what a legend

lol

Peace Through Strength

he was pretty legit tbh

of muzzie bitches

shame about his son

take your pi ck

but he was fucking fantastic

yeah rousseau did it first, but locke's version is the english one

there is also hobbes's take

these people are gay

I just want black ppl off my street

lol

yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?

did they ever talk about that?

machiavelli has his place too

contemporary wise

because hobbes is a monarchist and rousseau is a loonie

that is why

there is hobbes too

"yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?"
And now we get to the main problem that results of Liberalism

drives me nuts that most intellectuals speak just to sound smart rather than addressing a real world problem

i never finished leviathan tho

sir thomas moore too

in this i agree with Doom

talk is CHEAP

CHEAP

@ManAnimal the simplest solution to most any problem is force and they seem incapable of comprehending this puzzlingly enough

would it be fair to say locke's version is prolly the closest to reality

they stumble their way into using force sure

in the likes of antifa and hostile government