Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 602283282016632832
cause the academics understand Locke and Sargon respects the academic community
not sure why though
Locke is rather early
>early
Sargon has a big brain guys
That’s why
he was like uh
1600s?
not that early
Locke is for big brains
all things said
and pretty damn """""authoritarian""""" for later Liberals
i mean
holy shit lol
you want a good example of effective authoritarianism?
Big brains but little real world applicabilty
fucking uh
Oliver Cromwell
what a legend
lol
he was pretty legit tbh
of muzzie bitches
shame about his son
take your pi ck
but he was fucking fantastic
yeah rousseau did it first, but locke's version is the english one
there is also hobbes's take
these people are gay
I just want black ppl off my street
lol
yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?
did they ever talk about that?
machiavelli has his place too
contemporary wise
because hobbes is a monarchist and rousseau is a loonie
that is why
there is hobbes too
"yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?"
And now we get to the main problem that results of Liberalism
drives me nuts that most intellectuals speak just to sound smart rather than addressing a real world problem
i never finished leviathan tho