Message from @Muten
Discord ID: 602439903057412127
Ds2 tried hard at least. You could do some really strange shit. But, the greatswords weren't as fun
There's this amazing weapon in two, that doesn't have any comparison
The puzzlingly stoned sword
Without upgrade, it has S in dex, and was the most versatile weapon in the entire game. Whip, straightsword, and rapier. All in one
And no one used it, because spics didn't talk about it being "meta"
So even at 45 million souls, you'd be finding people who'd never seen it
https://gyazo.com/37c2472bad1e72d3c63ae3c850c3ef08 Forgot how weird warcraft 3 players were
Oh, just one thing, if you ever see that large round leather shield, in a souls game again
Don't use it
That thing is utterly laughable. I would just poke at it, and watch the stamina chunk down
Silence, game nerd.
It's probably worse in reality
generally, I don't like pvp, mostly because connection is shit down here, but I doubt it'd be fun anyway's
ds2 was the most fun I had in pvp
Seemed to be more varied builds
DS3 everyone builds the same
Bosses were better in DS3 though
Depends. Ds3 is shit for pvp. You'll be matched with hundreds of Brazilians, most of whom don't do anything but spam rapier basics, straightsword basics, or the specials with heavy weapons
I hated the bosses in ds3
I'm gonna shove my dick in you @PureEvilPie
Oof
The dlc was the only good shit
When is that boss being released
Everything was the same pace and timing
I think there were two bosses you actually beat differently than any other
One being the dragon, the next being the old king
greatwood
was garbage
Yup
There's one positive thing to say for ds3, and that's the ability to make an almost replica of Guts
DS3 was a good game, just PVP was lame
and it was too long
It felt too short imo, just a lot of hoping the next boss wasn't ass
My roommate didn't even finish it
DS3 was shorter than 2 iirc
Ye
Two, despite having terrible level design late game, was actually more playable
I haven't finished 3 btw
Nah SOTFS is so broken