Message from @Swedishmafia101
Discord ID: 604364291361079326
fuck is this question
fuck all of those questions
Lmao
Heh, good
It's already illegal
They don't need to make it illegal
If anyone examines the evolutionary theory of how life began through theh lense of mathematics, the probability is MUCH higher that another person will be born EXACTLY like you and will live your EXACT same life than the odds of amino acids randomly combining to form the first proteins. @Ferris, what do you think?
wtf is this shit <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Who wants weak leadership?
I mean seriously.
What, no "depends" option, Tato?
how is this not common sense
stronger leadership better
@Tato 9axes is an improved version, but more questions
what kind of incel do u have to be to think weak leadership is good
When it's Hitler, Tato
When the leadership is so strong it's uncontrained
Good leadership > strong leadership
what does strong even mean
iron fist or good quality?
Strong leadership = no power for me.
Absolutism
Good leadership is knowing when to be strong and when to be flexible.
That's the problem with those kinds of quizes - the questions can have nuanced answers, or can be interpreted in different ways
"It is he who will triumph that knows when to fight and when not to fight"
That's why you should take multiple quizzes, but I believe the 9axes and 8values tests are quite good
And the test creators listen to feedback from participants
Why take a test when you can discuss/articulate your views directly?
Ehhh
True @Eccles but that is also what allows the tests to work. Sort of like the mandelbrot tests.
strong leadership=good leadership
anglo fags dont have separate word for good and good
^
Trouble is, those normally writting the tests don't have the resolution to create single diminsion questions that corrleate
Women can see what most men cannot. Men can see what most women cannot.
All people - regardless of factors like culture or sexuality - should be treated equally. < this depends so much on context
>All people - regardless of factors like culture or sexuality - should be treated equally.
smh no
yeah, that statement is so wrought with fundamental assumptions as to be meaningless