shame has no meaning in a man's world and as reflected in the German language, if you have a group of 1 million 'male' objects, the ENTIRE group becomes female if you inject just a SINGLE female into that group

...cause that's the way life works.

Das the opposite of French (and Polish)

lol; i know

French feminists call it misogynistic^^

French and Polish; not know for military (male dominated ) prowess

same with Italians

France used to be the dominant military power of Europe...

Until Germany was unified

Everythin was ALWAYS 'misogynistic' to the French

Well, it's the mentality that is the key. French and Polish are governed by passion.

Sometimes that is nessecary and you won't become a great artist with discipline alone

Germans are governed by discipline making even the males at the bottom competent soldiers but even those at the top lousy artists.

"In heaven, the British are the Police, the Germans are the Mechanics, the French are the Artists and the Italians are the cooks"

Sounds like a nation of followers tbh

More so then others that is

In hell, the British are the cooks, the French are the Mechanics, the French are the Cooks and the Germans aere the Police"

Well, as individuals men lead. But the majority of life isn't spent alone. It's spend around families and in social situations.

And in those areas, men yield to women as they always have. Just used to have plenty of spaces which were only ours.

Even the presumption of innocence is made possible by telling the State to stay out of your business and let more bad guys loose in favor of not locking up the innnocent. More bad guys on the street and no State in your life meant women needed good men to insulate them from bad men

>the French are the mechanics
Hell must still be medieval then

and, like in the old West, if a women fucked over too many men, then a man could just refuse to take care of the bear when it came for her in the night...

Now, she can pour acid on your dick for you simply publishing pictures she shouldn't have made with a person she couldn't TRUST in the FIRST PLACE

If one cannot swim and they keep diving into the deep end of the pool, assuming someone will always be there to save them, at what point is it the idiot's fault? If a woman mistakes a wolf for a dog, let's it into the house and it kills your infant while you are away, do you blame the wolf? No, you SHOOT the wolf. You blame the idiot that gave the wolf access in the first place.

Too bad this logic doesn't apply to women that conviced they are just as capable as a man, allow someone they shouldn't trust to gain access and he assaults her.

MA sperging misogyny again

muh soggy knees lol

Nah MA legit just hates women lmao

Oof.

One of them mustve stolen his money at some point

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. I and a few others once had a 3 hour-plus debate with him over whether or not incitement to violence or making threats should be a crime.

Lmao which side was he on

He thot they shouldn't be.

Nice

Indeed. It was quite the brain workout.

That unironically means he must think Hitler did nothing wrong

I suppose not.

MA is woke

Then again, I'm not usually the type to make cheap rhetorical shots like that. <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

But it stands up lmao

I'm kinda the anti-aidspig.