Precedent says otherwise

Even if it is a person

If it is a person, and you kill it, and it's not self defence, it's murder.

Ive already demonstrated why

@Scale_eto you specifically

No

You gave no defeater

It was held as murder before

@Jack of Trades Poorly

Doesn't matter

You need to be certain to change precedent

@Scale_e you gave no defeater

@Coolitic I'm certain it doesn't matter;)

No, you just didnt accept it because you're stubborn

Why are you arguing legalistically over a moral matter? Are you literally Jews trying to figure out what the Torah says about the issue, lol?

And, again

It's up to the states for what the federal govt doesnt decide on

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM They refuse to accept the moral argument.

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM because it's not a clear answer and the weak need rules,so we've got to decide which to pass down

@Scale_e your moral argument has been defeated

>weak

It is clear. You do not have the moral right to kill a person that is not an immediate threat to your life.

@Scale_e it's not murder

Given that fervent abortion cucks are all low t fags

@Jack of Trades It is

Not sure if u get to call the others "weak"

@Scale_e please provide a defeater to my argument then

We did

You ignored

@Jack of Trades Tell me the argument

Because you are arrogant

Cant argue with a wall

No you didn't, you kept asserting it was murder xD

Nope

is your point still the kid and the kidney @Jack of Trades ?

@Scale_e 5 year old dying, forcing to keep alive with my body

Also

You remember?

Jack justifies loli

Remember that folks

@ebinmemes22 I changed it for you