Lmao

@Coolitic I didn't xD

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

It's not delegated by the constitution is it?

@Jack of Trades the states dont get to decide

@Coolitic right but, if it's not in the constitution

Is my point

Meaning, if its not in the constitution, its up to each state.

They forced it federally

At most it should be state level

Then it's legal to begin with

Then why push it to the SC

@Coolitic and they make use of that regularly with laws that affect abortion

Again, BS decision

The SC doesnt set precent on uncertainty

And it certainly cant come up with trimester limits

That's the job of the legislative branch

So again

@Coolitic I didn't push it there. The people challenging it did. The SC ultimately sided eighth the constitution. "No law prohibiting? Legal!"

Thanks for agreeing with me that its not the power of the federal govt

Glad we agree it's not unconstitutional then

Imagine moving goalposts

So blatantly

Are you mutts arguing again about the providential nature of your piece of paper that you don't even follow?

What country are you from again?

The internet

Nice

thx

There are federal laws against murder and robbery, and these laws have been justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, as well as the Commerce Clause.
10A doesn't apply. If it's murder, it can't be up to each state. If it's murder, its a federal issue.
If the fetus is a person, killing it is murder.

@Scale_e it's not murder

Precedent says otherwise

Even if it is a person

If it is a person, and you kill it, and it's not self defence, it's murder.

Ive already demonstrated why

@Scale_eto you specifically

No

You gave no defeater

It was held as murder before

@Jack of Trades Poorly

Doesn't matter

You need to be certain to change precedent