"I'm sorry dude. I didn't realize you were such an upstanding citizen. there is nothing weird here! have a nice day."

anyone who has tried to program a robot knows it is ALOT more complicate than one assumes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3msm4EO4E4s

**RUNNING ON EMPTY, FOOD REVIEW!**

@Weez i love how he has a cricket track playing

a person should be able to be safe from having extremely embarassing pictures taken without their consent or knowledge from being distributed online.

Have a few mbs of cp. Upsave it at a rediculous resolution. Have TERABYTES!!!!

basically

@money_sign_
>have a few MBs of cp
negroid, what

@NinjaQuick okay thot

A PARENT should be safe from raising their kids as they see fit without the STATE superceding their judgments

how does one only have a couple MBs of CP

We aren't in a totalitarian state... yet

that's like....a handful of pictures

at most

I agree, I think a person should be able to request their images be removed, but that's the line i draw

unless it's of them committing a crime

whether one errors on the side of giving most power to the STATE or the PARENTS, you will ALWAYS have abuses

the point of CP being illegal isn't to catch all pedos, its to stop the creation and distribution of it.

that is just unavoidable

According to Theresa may kids belong to the state iirc

but the parents are the lesser of the two evils

so the only way to make it so non-abuse images to be illegal is to either over-broaden the law, or create a new law.

@NinjaQuick Only the creation.

this server https://tenor.com/view/tomoko-anime-gif-5447415

not really because laws are useless which you cannot realistically enforce

Distribution, too, used to be Grey market or even sold in adult stores.

and in order to enforce any law as you suggest, they would need 'just cause'

The law is more of a protection law

Quick question, are there mandatory minimums for sexual abuse of a minor?

The law was setup to stop the creation, not consumption of the material

not sure what you mean by 'protection law'

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck ninja is over here going into the history of case law of pedophilic pictures

The consumption of the material has essentially no 'harm'

Whereas the creation does

So if a site is hosting a picture of a teen, and the person in the Pic wants it removed, they would be able to ask it to be removed.

because he just happens to have knowledge and wants to enlighten you!

the law is more of a law to protect the law?

Yes

But I kinda agree with you tbh

The issue of consuming it is the creation of a market where creation makes sense.