i have heard it depends on the branch; don't know personally but i think Air Force is different

The point is that no doctor is allowed to do a procedure before telling you the potential long term side-effects.

When do u think we wont need soldiers on battlefield anymore off topic but

But those rules dont' apply with 'mental health'

Never?

Hopefully?

Y hopefully

i disagree

I think war always needs to have a cost

Because it'll never be real

Ye

Imagine army so advanced it can put out enemy without deploying soldiers

otherwise, we will do it more and more and it will become even more deadly

I mean ppl will starve to death spending all the though on drones :p

Dough

after all,, we fight 'conflcts' not 'wars' anymore

But in the ebd

It's about personal resolution

'wars' are fought for survival

us or the nazis;

<:brainlet:505799727657254922>

What dumb shit is he saying now?

There will be human cost of working personal but no soldiers

conflicts are fought for other interests and tend to occur 'elsewhere'

He doesn't even understand the difference between a war and a conflict?

Wars are declared.

Conflicts aren't

Only congress can declare war.

You moron.

there always has to be an element of death

that theme has been explore again and again in literature

It will but soldiers will be so ineffective deploying them will be useless

i tend to agree with it. Mistakes are the best teacher

some lessons you just can't learn without mistakes

Hm ok I can see some more sporty ways of solving wars but I doubt the existential kind of war will ever go away

if no bomb falls on Japan, then the US and USSR are goign to USE them rather than do everything to avoid it

America, under the loving leadership of it's older brothers in faith, has not been at war since Iraq!

Ppl with rifles will be the last line of defense

because Japan made everyone AWARE without doubt what would happen

you need those lessons

Eh, one could argue- effectively- boots on ground aren't required for conflict at this point in history