Message from @Jake VonFürth

Discord ID: 608489535499927553


2019-08-07 02:38:23 UTC  

so the pentagon is in a major city

2019-08-07 02:38:31 UTC  

planes fly around the area all the time

2019-08-07 02:38:32 UTC  

a stones throw by air

2019-08-07 02:38:38 UTC  

and you expect them to randomly scrample jets

2019-08-07 02:38:42 UTC  

read the JTAC docs

2019-08-07 02:38:44 UTC  

to shoot down a radom plane

2019-08-07 02:38:46 UTC  

one among many

2019-08-07 02:38:49 UTC  

They were on the tail of at least one plane, can't remember which one, but IIRC they were given orders not to fire.

Then again, the documentary I'm thinking of came out like, a decade ago, so I'm possibly misremembering things.

2019-08-07 02:38:51 UTC  

not 'random'

2019-08-07 02:38:52 UTC  

which was cleared for everything

2019-08-07 02:38:58 UTC  

by our own airports

2019-08-07 02:39:02 UTC  

and air traffic control

2019-08-07 02:39:03 UTC  

hostile the MOMENT it enters restricted airspace

2019-08-07 02:39:37 UTC  

the air traffic patterns are carefully laid out to keep commerical traffic in very specific lanes

2019-08-07 02:39:47 UTC  

espeically around sensitive areas

2019-08-07 02:39:56 UTC  

so

2019-08-07 02:40:01 UTC  

reagan airport

2019-08-07 02:40:03 UTC  

is like

2019-08-07 02:40:05 UTC  

right next to

2019-08-07 02:40:07 UTC  

the pentagon

2019-08-07 02:40:10 UTC  

You do realize they move at like, 700 MPH right? Commercial planes can cross all of NYC in a couple of minutes, much less through the restricted airspace in question.

2019-08-07 02:40:44 UTC  

yes, but any plane LANDING at Reagan MUST REDUCE AIRSPEED to avoid overshooting the runway

2019-08-07 02:41:00 UTC  

this means if they do NOT, they have time to SHOOT THEM DOWN

2019-08-07 02:41:30 UTC  

9/11 truthers are always quick to blame the all powerful and totally competent bush admin but never seem to point out how the attackers had Saudi ties.

2019-08-07 02:41:54 UTC  

because their approach vectors (which includes speed) dictates if they are indeed in a particular flight path

2019-08-07 02:42:06 UTC  

Your pointing fingers at the wrong govt.

2019-08-07 02:42:06 UTC  

it's like a carousel

2019-08-07 02:42:26 UTC  

if you miss your approach window, there is a plane behind you... so you have to loop around

2019-08-07 02:42:41 UTC  

too fast and you overtake the plane in front of you

2019-08-07 02:43:31 UTC  

A typical fully loaded 747 would be landing at around 25,0000kgs. The landing speed would be around 145kts-150kts (166mph-172mph)

2019-08-07 02:43:41 UTC  

and you have to me moving abnormally fast for a considerable time, not to mention communicating everything is fine with air traffic control in order to not raise a red flag

2019-08-07 02:43:42 UTC  

so a second to go the distance from the airport to the pentagon

2019-08-07 02:43:44 UTC  

even at landing speed

2019-08-07 02:43:47 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-08-07 02:44:05 UTC  

doesn't work that way

2019-08-07 02:44:22 UTC  

aircraft must be moving no faster that 130mph to touch down

2019-08-07 02:44:29 UTC  

i think youre overestimating things lol

2019-08-07 02:44:42 UTC  

even at 130 mph it could coer the distance to the pentagon in less than a second

2019-08-07 02:44:47 UTC  

that requires a specific flight configuration for planes that size

2019-08-07 02:44:49 UTC  

Let me ask you this:

Why would the United States goverment, the non-commie gov that has the biggest obsession with not being embarrassed, the government that is obsessed with showing off their military power, be so willing to admit that they fucked up to the point of showing video of their own military headquarters being attacked, if it didn't legitimately happen?

2019-08-07 02:45:41 UTC  

air at lower altitudes is thicker and thus flaps must be extended on approach to compensate. those same flaps would be ripped the hell off at higher speeds