Message from @Killzone

Discord ID: 609422754143535133


2019-08-09 16:26:45 UTC  

>hamas has a twitter

2019-08-09 16:26:46 UTC  

launching an ICBM would absolutely make people not happy and possibly retaliate because mirvs

2019-08-09 16:26:56 UTC  

mid-range weapons place the firing ability in the hands of generals and commander on the front

2019-08-09 16:27:04 UTC  

how about a MRBM

2019-08-09 16:27:06 UTC  

dab

2019-08-09 16:27:15 UTC  

where larger weapons the order has to come from the top

2019-08-09 16:27:21 UTC  

no BM, just put it on a cruise missile

2019-08-09 16:27:27 UTC  

drop it on baghdad

2019-08-09 16:27:28 UTC  

A nuclear attack in modern day would either terrify other non nuclear countries into compliance or completely radicalised every other nuclear power.

2019-08-09 16:27:33 UTC  

people would be outraged

2019-08-09 16:27:41 UTC  

what if we nuke iran

2019-08-09 16:27:45 UTC  

again

2019-08-09 16:27:47 UTC  

before they make nukes

2019-08-09 16:27:48 UTC  

aha

2019-08-09 16:27:56 UTC  

"completely radicalised every other nuclear power"

2019-08-09 16:28:06 UTC  

they would figure, "Use em' or Lose em"

2019-08-09 16:28:22 UTC  

especially countries with few

2019-08-09 16:28:23 UTC  

Just start nuking each other and get it over with, ffs

2019-08-09 16:28:27 UTC  

if joe nukes his enemies why shouldnt I nuke mine

2019-08-09 16:28:27 UTC  

I wonder if someone starts a nuclear war

2019-08-09 16:28:29 UTC  

Nothing to lose at that point.

2019-08-09 16:28:31 UTC  

that they would stop

2019-08-09 16:28:35 UTC  

and try to talk to eachother

2019-08-09 16:28:39 UTC  

unlikely

2019-08-09 16:28:39 UTC  

or ban using nukes

2019-08-09 16:28:47 UTC  

for a conventional war

2019-08-09 16:29:04 UTC  

Antifa and dems are SEVERLY outmatched.. do they stop and TALK?

2019-08-09 16:29:05 UTC  

nope, and you can't ban nukes either

2019-08-09 16:29:15 UTC  

arrogance is legend

2019-08-09 16:29:30 UTC  

oo what if a ww3 began in the 50s

2019-08-09 16:29:37 UTC  

or before ballistic missiles

2019-08-09 16:29:41 UTC  

so you have to use bombers

2019-08-09 16:29:42 UTC  

if the US tells the whole world "due to the escalations and threats coming from this state, and with the desire to minimize human cost by effecting a single strike, we will be detonating a 10kt nuclear warhead on IRANs nuclear facilities at (coordinates) on (date) at (time). Our allies, and any parties interested will be given the launch point and the delivery will be made via cruise missile. thanks and have a nice day"

2019-08-09 16:29:47 UTC  

isn't that the plot of 1984

2019-08-09 16:30:00 UTC  

too many today are alloud to hit without being hit BACK and that leads to a callous and arogance when it comes to using force

2019-08-09 16:30:02 UTC  

***COMRADES***

2019-08-09 16:30:35 UTC  

If they ban nukes what's stopping them from using chem or bio weapons. These rules of war change with the times. The germans in ww1 thought the use of shotguns barbaric and banned their use but the US didn't care.

2019-08-09 16:30:37 UTC  

if the US said that, we'd have missles inbound within an hr

2019-08-09 16:30:41 UTC  

even add a "this launch will be cancelled if the state (iran) de-escalates and returns to negotiations and makes immediate and permanent efforts to comply with our needs.