Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 609422626334441492
And deploys it in a cruise missile that can be tracked
it's why the mid-range treaty was important IMO
people would be outraged, but it would not spark all out war
everyone knew using a nuke of any sort would end badly
>hamas has a twitter
launching an ICBM would absolutely make people not happy and possibly retaliate because mirvs
mid-range weapons place the firing ability in the hands of generals and commander on the front
how about a MRBM
dab
where larger weapons the order has to come from the top
no BM, just put it on a cruise missile
drop it on baghdad
A nuclear attack in modern day would either terrify other non nuclear countries into compliance or completely radicalised every other nuclear power.
people would be outraged
what if we nuke iran
again
before they make nukes
aha
they would figure, "Use em' or Lose em"
especially countries with few
Just start nuking each other and get it over with, ffs
if joe nukes his enemies why shouldnt I nuke mine
I wonder if someone starts a nuclear war
Nothing to lose at that point.
that they would stop
and try to talk to eachother
unlikely
or ban using nukes
for a conventional war
Antifa and dems are SEVERLY outmatched.. do they stop and TALK?
nope, and you can't ban nukes either
arrogance is legend
oo what if a ww3 began in the 50s
or before ballistic missiles
so you have to use bombers
if the US tells the whole world "due to the escalations and threats coming from this state, and with the desire to minimize human cost by effecting a single strike, we will be detonating a 10kt nuclear warhead on IRANs nuclear facilities at (coordinates) on (date) at (time). Our allies, and any parties interested will be given the launch point and the delivery will be made via cruise missile. thanks and have a nice day"
isn't that the plot of 1984
too many today are alloud to hit without being hit BACK and that leads to a callous and arogance when it comes to using force