because of stupid failiures and carelessnes

if someone is threatening you with nuclear force, it makes a great case of why you should also have nuclear force...

yes

it does

US has still 3 nukes they never found after accidentally losing them

point is new eqipment that is given priority doesn't do this

Well they were also the first to use mustard gas. I think they protested because the buck shot made it harder to treat wounded. Although from that perspective using any artillery would have been barbaric in the extreme.

nuclear contingent has been placed on the back burner

it hasn't as much as you think lol

wheee as Russian and china are constantly working on theirs

the US has been developing nukes the entire time lol

it was set back by some unfortunate losses in data

what can I say . (you forget what I used to do...)

let me find the story

imagine wanting to be a druid

I don't know how being a sex toy for sailors years ago makes you an expert on stockpile stewardship

so i feel we're on equal footing here

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10373827/General-in-charge-of-Americas-nuclear-weapons-sacked-for-misbehaviour.html

there is one

macarthur amirite

we gotta nuke korea

and china

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization

20320322 times

another about modernizationneed

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-08/nuclear-weapons-america-s-arsenal-needs-an-update

Just recently in Bloomberg

again, i think if the nuclear states give long warnings, and open time to negotiate multi-laterally before the action is taken, and all efforts to keep damage to the target with as little damage as possible to residencies and historic buildings, businesses and commercial/industrial (civilan) facilities, then I think nukes wouldn't result in all out war

Bloomberg lol

if global warming is a thing then volcanic or nuclear winter is ace!

1 + (-1) = NORMAL

https://youtu.be/o-zoPgv_nYg

https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-future-americas-nuclear-deterrent-9512

Again, like Russia would need to have a very good reason for the US not taking the action, the state being targeted could also participate in the talks, because they are the ones directly threatening civilian lives

McCain's brain tumour should have a noble peace prize.

and that's critical to me, is the threat of civilian life

Obama didn't spend much at all on updates. Neither did Bush

that is 20 yrs

if a soldier gets shot or a ship is sunk, fucking whatever

they signed up

they can get shot