Message from @Jack Bright
Discord ID: 599112366457880577
which its not
Not necessarily equal.
You gotta at least acknowledge the theory first, because you would want the same courtesy from others about your own ideas
Then you can go into the realizability
Marx was actually a lot less radical than today's AntiFa type
Communism is less radical than the idea of strict equality
it's less equality of outcome and more the unconditional sating of material wants and needs predicated on hyperabundance
Really? The Constant revolution guy is less radical?
Sadly, yes
Man.
Marx only predicted the revolution, he didn't say there has to be a revolution
And he predicted wrongly
There will be no revolution, at least not for the reasons he thought
Heres my results lol
How'd I do lads?
You are a commie
17%
Yeah that ratio is very clear, get a helicopter
Man, you also have more commie than me
What is even essentialism?
I really didn't expect this.
Constructivism is bad mkay
Holy shit Drywall you fucking anarchist lmao
Gender is social construct.
That's constructivism.
Constructivism = gender social construct
Essentialism = Biological differences determine gender roles
Yeah that dna differences and such don’t exist
Which is bullshit
That everything is a product of society
Constructivism, at least when it comes to the differences between sexes, is legit false.
There are actual demonstrable physiological and neurological differences.
Its almost like we have a different god damn chromosome, the literal blueprints of our bodies aren't the same.
When it asked if sexuality is a social concept *STRONGLY DISAGREE*
yeah
Its been proven repeatedly you cannot force someone to change their sexual preference.
It becomes complicated when it comes to human action in general though. Like how much of a person beliefs are their own or how much come from parents, schools and such.
I think i picked somewhat in that one.